From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: OpenSM: reporting traps 129, 130, 131 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20091112203604.GS7192@me> References: <4AF6D78E.6080600@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20091112154213.GH7192@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org, Linux RDMA List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 11:38 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > We've cared for several years now (babbling port policy was introduced > into the master on 7/6/09) but this issue still persists. Are you > saying no reports for these traps until the trap rate is obeyed ? If existing trap rate filtering in OpenSM is sufficient we can add reporting (if somebody needs this). I just don't think that we need to introduce temporary options. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html