From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Cohen Subject: Re: RDMAoE verbs questions Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20091125144108.GA18088@mtls03> References: <209ECE49-3AB9-4E62-B825-54E474321FA6@cisco.com> <20091125001136.GP6188@obsidianresearch.com> <4B0D3982.2040408@mellanox.co.il> <7127F20E-2307-492D-B929-A6ACA5A74D14@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7127F20E-2307-492D-B929-A6ACA5A74D14-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff Squyres Cc: Tziporet Koren , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Eli Cohen List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:30:40AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > In practice, we have seen that applications *do* need to query the > transport type -- at least (real) IB vs. iWARP. It is your > expectation that IB and IBoE will function identically? > > Can you discuss the "transport" vs. "transport_type" questions? > The reason for identifying each specific port with its own transport is to allow devices which may configure each port differently to be distinhishable. ConnectX is one such device. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html