Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] opensm: connect switches in tree - implemented in fat-tree

[Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 13:09 Wed 04 Nov     , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> This patch implements connect_roots and connect_switches
> option in fat-tree. Actually, both options mapped to the
> same implementation.
> 
> The idea is the following: pick some leaf switch in the
> fabric. Now go over all the switches above the leaf level
> in the tree. If these switches don't know how to route to
> some LID and the selected leaf switch does know, route this
> LID to the leaf switch.
> 
> [v2 - no changes, just rebased]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c |   92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> index 1b1da19..ddb77b7 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> @@ -2949,6 +2949,90 @@ static void fabric_route_to_switches(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
>  /***************************************************
>   ***************************************************/
> 
> +static void fabric_route_down_up_switches(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
> +{
> +	uint16_t lid;
> +	uint8_t port_num;
> +	osm_port_t *p_port;
> +	ftree_sw_t *p_sw;
> +	ftree_sw_t *p_leaf_sw;
> +
> +	OSM_LOG_ENTER(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We need a switch that will accomodate all the down/up turns in
> +	 * the fabric. Having these turn in a single place in the fabric
> +	 * will not create credit loops.
> +	 * So we need to select this switch.
> +	 * The idea here is to chose leaf with the highest index. I don't
> +	 * have any theory to back me up on this. It's just a general thought
> +	 * that this way the switch that might be a bottleneck for many mcast
> +	 * groups will be far away from the OpenSM, so it will draw the
> +	 * multicast traffic away from the SM.
> +	 */
> +
> +	p_leaf_sw = p_ftree->leaf_switches[p_ftree->leaf_switches_num-1];
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Now go over all the switches in the fabric that
> +	 * have lower rank, and route the missing LIDs to
> +	 * the selected leaf switch.
> +	 * In short, this leaf switch now poses a target
> +	 * for all those missing LIDs.
> +	 */
> +
> +	for (p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_head(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
> +	     p_sw != (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_end(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
> +	     p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_sw->map_item)) {
> +
> +		if (p_sw->rank >= p_ftree->leaf_switch_rank)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		for (lid = 1; lid <= p_leaf_sw->p_osm_sw->max_lid_ho; lid ++) {
> +
> +			if (p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] != OSM_NO_PATH ||
> +			    p_leaf_sw->hops[lid] == OSM_NO_PATH)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			p_port = cl_ptr_vector_get(
> +				&p_ftree->p_osm->subn.port_lid_tbl, lid);
> +
> +			/* we're interested only in switches */
> +			if (!p_port && !p_port->p_node && !p_port->p_node->sw)

'p_port->p_node = NULL' is invalid case and this check is not needed.

> +				continue;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * the missing LID will be routed through the same
> +			 * port that routes to the selected leaf switch
> +			 */
> +			port_num = p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[p_leaf_sw->base_lid];
> +
> +			OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
> +				"Switch %s: setting path to LID %u "
> +				"through port %u\n",
> +				tuple_to_str(p_sw->tuple), lid, port_num);
> +
> +			/* set local lft */
> +			p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] = port_num;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Set local min hop table.
> +			 * The distance to the target LID is a distance
> +			 * to the selected leaf switch plus the distance
> +			 * from the leaf to the target LID.
> +			 */
> +			sw_set_hops(p_sw, lid, port_num,
> +				p_sw->hops[p_leaf_sw->base_lid] +
> +				p_leaf_sw->hops[lid], TRUE);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	OSM_LOG_EXIT(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
> +}				/* fabric_route_roots() */
> +
> +/***************************************************
> + ***************************************************/

Such comments were removed recently, please don't introduce a new ones.

Sasha

> +
>  static int fabric_populate_nodes(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
>  {
>  	osm_node_t *p_osm_node;
> @@ -3978,6 +4062,14 @@ static int do_routing(IN void *context)
>  		"Filling switch forwarding tables for switch-to-switch paths\n");
>  	fabric_route_to_switches(p_ftree);
> 
> +	if (p_ftree->p_osm->subn.opt.connect_roots ||
> +	    p_ftree->p_osm->subn.opt.connect_switches) {
> +		OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> +			"Connecting switches that are unreachable within "
> +			"Up/Down rules\n");
> +		fabric_route_down_up_switches(p_ftree);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* for each switch, set its fwd table */
>  	cl_qmap_apply_func(&p_ftree->sw_tbl, set_sw_fwd_table, (void *)p_ftree);
> 
> -- 
> 1.5.1.4
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html