From: sebastien dugue <sebastien.dugue-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
To: kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org
Cc: Vincent Ficet <jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
BOURDE CELINE <Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ?
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:08:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091203100807.37f259b2@frecb007965> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B177F10.1040908-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:04:16 +0200
Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> sebastien dugue wrote:
> > Hi Yevgeny,
> >
> > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:01:28 +0200
> > Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Sebastien,
> >>
> >> I noticed that you found the problem in IPoIB child
> >> interfaces configuration. Glad that this worked out well.
> >>
> >> My question is about the note that you left in the issue:
> >>
> >> " It looks like in 'datagram' mode, the SL weights
> >> do not seem to be applied, or maybe this is an
> >> artifact of IPoIB in 'datagram mode' "
> >>
> >> Have you checked that in this mode you do get the right
> >> SL for each child interface by shutting off the relevant
> >> SL (mapping it to VL15)?
> >
> > Yes, SL to VL mapping is OK.
> >
> >> If yes, then what you're saying is that you see that
> >> interfaces use the right SL and VL, but you don't see
> >> any arbitration between VLs?
> >
> > Right, whatever the weights I put in the vlarbs tables have absolutely
> > no effect when IPoIB is in datagram mode. I don't know if it's
> > an arbitration problem (don't think so) or an IPoIB problem.
> >
> > Could be that due to the 2044 bytes MTU in datagram mode, iperf
> > spends much time not doing transfers and fails to provide enough
> > data to the interfaces. Don't know.
> >
> > Once I switched to connected mode, with a 65520 bytes MTU, things
> > started to work OK with a much better overall combined bandwidth.
>
> OK, then "a much better overall combined bandwidth" is an
> answer here. VL arbitration kicks in only when you saturate
> the link. If you don't, there's no point doing arbitration,
> because HW is able so serve any packet that comes w/o the
> need to prioritize.
Yep, that's the conclusion I came to.
Might be interesting to find where the bottleneck is though, that
prevents saturating the link.
Sébastien.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 10:57 QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ? Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D0DB2.6080802-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 12:12 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D1F36.1090007-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:01 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D38C7.3080505-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:37 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D410E.2010903-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:14 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D49F0.6060400-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:45 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D5110.70606-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 7:57 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E34EB.6020403-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E3B63.40705-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:49 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E4105.5080107-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 9:56 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E50D6.8020401-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:01 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177058.9070909-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:17 ` sebastien dugue
2009-12-03 9:04 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177F10.1040908-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:08 ` sebastien dugue [this message]
2009-12-03 8:21 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <4B1774F0.9060002-hKgKHo2Ms0FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:05 ` sebastien dugue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091203100807.37f259b2@frecb007965 \
--to=sebastien.dugue-6ktuutfb/bm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox