Re: [PATCH] tests/subnet_discover: discover test utility

[Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Ira,

On 18:28 Sun 20 Dec     , Ira Weiny wrote:
> 
> Yes, a similar mechanism would work in libibnetdisc.  However, it looks like you are doing a depth first search

I wouldn't call it so, it is rather "parallel" than "first" depth or
breath - discovery continues at first responding node doesn't matter how
was it queried in depth or in breath.

> which I fear might exceed the path count limit in a DR path?

Right, hops count should be limited. I will add this.

> Is this how OpenSM works?

I think so. The difference is that OpenSM has a limit of outstanding
MADs on the wire and subnet_discover doesn't (and there could be a lot
of MADs).

> I was trying to do a breath first search like ibnetdiscover does.
> 
> > 
> > Would you like to look at this?
> 
> No problem, I have enclosed the output from a run on Hyperion.
> There appears to be a lot of errors.  I am not sure what the issue is right off.  I have included an ibnetdiscover output for comparision.

Thanks.

An errors are response timeouts. I guess that most of them are due
to switches' VL15 overflow (could be verified by VL15Dropped counter
evaluation). Will look at this deeply.

Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html