From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/subnet_discover: discover test utility Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:31:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20100112093145.GF26089@me> References: <20090816110200.GS25501@me> <20090817083023.da17378b.weiny2@llnl.gov> <20090823120609.GG9547@me> <20090826164026.8dcce4b2.weiny2@llnl.gov> <20091023234349.GK5764@me> <20091220121406.GF5262@me> <20091220182809.f7e17fae.weiny2@llnl.gov> <20091221073550.GB18524@me> <20091228092251.GR26940@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: Ira Weiny , linux-rdma , Al Chu List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi Hal, On 08:56 Mon 11 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > diff --git a/tests/subnet_discover.c b/tests/subnet_discover.c > > index 7f8a85c..42e7aee 100644 > > --- a/tests/subnet_discover.c > > +++ b/tests/subnet_discover.c > > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static struct node *node_array[32 * 1024]; > > =A0static unsigned node_count =3D 0; > > =A0static unsigned trid_cnt =3D 0; > > =A0static unsigned outstanding =3D 0; > > +static unsigned max_outstanding =3D 8; >=20 > Any reason why this default is different from the one which OpenSM > uses ? Seems to me it should be the same (or less). In my tests I found that '8' is more optimal number (the tool works faster and without drops) than '4' used in OpenSM. Of course it would be helpful to run this over bigger cluster than what I have to see that the results are consistent. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html