From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Slava Strebkov <slavas-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Yevgeny Kliteynik
<kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: Multicast root switch calculation
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:59:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120115936.GC25576@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39C75744D164D948A170E9792AF8E7CA01F6FA8A-QfUkFaTmzUSUvQqKE/ONIwC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
On 13:32 Wed 20 Jan , Slava Strebkov wrote:
> "average hops" was chosen instead of "max hops" because in root weight
> calculation the number of ports is also important, not only the distance
> (hops).
But this patch is declared as root switch calculation optimization, not
as algorithm change (actually I even missed this part in V1).
If you think that an algorithm should be changed we need to handle this
separately.
And there could be a discussion - I have report that some days ago
credit loop issue was observed when "average hops" method was used
(and then it was replaced by "max hops"). I don't have much details
about this case and cannot be sure that it was not "false alarm" (or
outdated information), but anyway I think that we should be careful
here.
Sasha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:sashakvolt-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Sasha
> Khapyorsky
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:27 PM
> To: Slava Strebkov
> Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Eli Dorfman; Or Gerlitz; Yevgeny
> Kliteynik
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: Multicast root switch calculation
>
> Hi Slava,
>
> On 16:11 Thu 03 Dec , Slava Strebkov wrote:
> > Proposed new algorithm for calculation of root switch for multicast
> > spanning tree. Only edge switches(those connected to hosts) and
> > switches - multicast members themselves are involved in root
> calculation.
> > This gives improvement, especially on large fabrics, since number of
> > switches usually much less then the number of ports, shared same mcast
> > group.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Slava Strebkov <slavas-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > @@ -231,32 +342,27 @@ static float
> osm_mcast_mgr_compute_max_hops(osm_sm_t * sm, cl_qlist_t * l,
> > of the multicast group.
> >
> **********************************************************************/
> > static osm_switch_t *mcast_mgr_find_optimal_switch(osm_sm_t * sm,
> > - cl_qlist_t *list)
> > + cl_qlist_t * list)
> > {
> > cl_qmap_t *p_sw_tbl;
> > osm_switch_t *p_sw, *p_best_sw = NULL;
> > float hops = 0;
> > float best_hops = 10000; /* any big # will do */
> > -#ifdef OSM_VENDOR_INTF_ANAFA
> > - boolean_t use_avg_hops = TRUE; /* anafa2 - bug hca on switch
> *//* use max hops for root */
> > -#else
> > - boolean_t use_avg_hops = FALSE; /* use max hops for root */
> > -#endif
> > -
> > + cl_qmap_t mcast_member_sw_tbl;
> > OSM_LOG_ENTER(sm->p_log);
> >
> > p_sw_tbl = &sm->p_subn->sw_guid_tbl;
> >
> > + mcast_mgr_build_switch_map(sm, list, &mcast_member_sw_tbl);
> > for (p_sw = (osm_switch_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_sw_tbl);
> > p_sw != (osm_switch_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_sw_tbl);
> > p_sw = (osm_switch_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_sw->map_item)) {
> > if (!osm_switch_supports_mcast(p_sw))
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (use_avg_hops)
> > - hops = osm_mcast_mgr_compute_avg_hops(sm, list,
> p_sw);
> > - else
> > - hops = osm_mcast_mgr_compute_max_hops(sm, list,
> p_sw);
> > + hops =
> > + osm_mcast_mgr_compute_avg_hops_weight(sm, p_sw,
> > +
> &mcast_member_sw_tbl);
>
> Any reason why was root switch computation method changed? By default it
> was "max hops" based and as far as I can see you changed this to
> "average hops".
>
> Sasha
>
> >
> > OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
> > "Switch 0x%016" PRIx64 ", hops = %f\n",
> > @@ -277,6 +383,7 @@ static osm_switch_t
> *mcast_mgr_find_optimal_switch(osm_sm_t * sm,
> > OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> > "No multicast capable switches detected\n");
> >
> > + mcast_mgr_destroy_switch_map(sm, &mcast_member_sw_tbl);
> > OSM_LOG_EXIT(sm->p_log);
> > return p_best_sw;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.6.3.3
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"
> in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-03 14:11 [PATCH v2] opensm: Multicast root switch calculation Slava Strebkov
[not found] ` <4B17C712.9010109-hKgKHo2Ms0F+cjeuK/JdrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-20 10:27 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-20 11:32 ` Slava Strebkov
[not found] ` <39C75744D164D948A170E9792AF8E7CA01F6FA8A-QfUkFaTmzUSUvQqKE/ONIwC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-20 11:59 ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
2010-01-27 10:45 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-28 15:39 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001280739m31dae78cj5ab7bd78621dcbfc-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-03 10:34 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-02-03 10:39 ` [PATCH v4] " Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-02-04 14:22 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231002040622l32c2fc9blc41318828f01cf35-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-04 18:52 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100120115936.GC25576@me \
--to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ogerlitz-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=slavas-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).