Re: [PATCH] tests/subnet_discover: discover test utility

Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-22T11:27:47Z

On 09:02 Mon 21 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > I wouldn't call it so, it is rather "parallel" than "first" depth or
> > breath - discovery continues at first responding node doesn't matter how
> > was it queried in depth or in breath.
>
> Does anything limit the amount of parallelism ?

Nothing in this version.

> > I think so. The difference is that OpenSM has a limit of outstanding
> > MADs on the wire and subnet_discover doesn't (and there could be a lot
> > of MADs).
>
> Isn't that dangerous in a real subnet ?

This is test tool, so I don't think that it is "dangerous". And of
course this can lead to an issues with test results.