Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_qos.c: Eliminate unneeded endport SL to VL setup

[Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Hal,

On 08:29 Mon 25 Jan     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> 
> when using optimized programming and it's supported by the switch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> index 6bbbfa2..afa454f 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,12 @@ int osm_qos_setup(osm_opensm_t * p_osm)
>  			    (&p_node->sw->switch_info))
>  				continue;
>  
> +			if (ib_switch_info_get_opt_sl2vlmapping(&p_node->sw->switch_info) &&
> +			    p_osm->sm.p_subn->opt.use_optimized_slvl &&
> +			    !memcmp(&swe_config.sl2vl, &sw0_config.sl2vl,
> +				    sizeof(swe_config.sl2vl)))
> +				continue;
> +

But then exports sl2vl tables setup loop should be changed starting from
port '0' (not '1'), right?

Sasha

>  			cfg = &sw0_config;
>  		} else if (osm_node_get_type(p_node) == IB_NODE_TYPE_ROUTER)
>  			cfg = &rtr_config;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html