From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, justin.chen@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: infiniband limit of 32 cards per system?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:59:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126035906.GA23347@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaiqapplv7.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
* Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>:
>
> > My colleague points out the following enum in uverbs_main.c:
> >
> > enum {
> > IB_UVERBS_MAJOR = 231,
> > IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR = 192,
> > IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES = 32
> > };
> >
> > Experimentally, we've determined that on a system where we
> > plugged in 40 IB cards, OFED only reports 32 cards are present.
>
> wow, 40 HCAs in one system !
HP sell some pretty big systems. :)
> > If that enum is indeed the limiting factor, would someone mind
> > explaining (or pointing me at TFM ;) why it's limited to 32
> > devices?
>
> That dates back to when device #s had 8 bits for major and 8 bits for
> minor. We got one major assigned for IB, and had to split up the 256
> minors that gave us among userspace verbs, management access, etc. And
> 32 seemed like a pretty reasonable limit for most uses.
Thanks for the explanation.
> Nowadays I guess we should look into expanding that to dynamic device
> numbers on overflow, assuming you do have a realistic situation where
> someone would want to use that many adapters per system.
Think of a large scale-up ia64 box, possibly running some
virtualization stack.
I'm guessing that it's not just a simple kernel fix though since
OFED has to change too, right?
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 23:50 infiniband limit of 32 cards per system? Alex Chiang
[not found] ` <20100125235013.GD2828-TYHnb5JFxdjwUeR5qC7q4g@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 3:48 ` Roland Dreier
2010-01-26 3:59 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
[not found] ` <20100126035906.GA23347-e+Ta4ugHZmL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adaaaw1pl5d.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 21:38 ` Alex Chiang
[not found] ` <20100126213803.GA12035-e+Ta4ugHZmL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 23:52 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adaiqapplv7.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 22:03 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-27 0:09 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100126035906.GA23347@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=justin.chen@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox