From: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Using multi-smps on the wire in libibnetdisc
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:03:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100205170326.699f7e64.weiny2@llnl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0e08f231002050427r37d326b4w4c188e30992579ac-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:27:05 -0500
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Note that 2 does not give much speed up, where 4 does. Obviously this could
> > have to do with the fact there were 2 nodes which were bad (so if you had
> > 100's of nodes unresponsive a higher value might be worth using)
>
> It depends on the number of unresponsive nodes being same or higher
> than number of outstanding/parallel SMPs. In a sense, the number of
> outstanding SMPs is a measure of how many unresponsive nodes one is
> willing to tolerate before slowing down/waiting for timeouts. In some
> environments, unresponsive nodes are a normal case.
Agreed but where should we set the default? I don't think 4 is a bad default.
I don't think it makes the diags overly aggressive, compared with OpenSM.
Sasha I guess this is your call.
Just tell me where to set it and I will make the patch. Basically with the
user option it can always be changed on a run by run basis.
Ira
>
> -- Hal
>
> > but as a
> > default compromise I think 4 is good.
> >
> > Ira
> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, I think you are correct that we should increase OpenSM's default from 4
> >> > > to 8. For the same reason as above. Some of our clusters have worked better
> >> > > with 8 when we are having issues. But right now we are still running with 4.
> >> >
> >> > I'm concerned about just increasing ibnetdiscover to 4 rather than 2.
> >> > I've seen a number of clusters with SMP dropping with the current
> >> > lower defaults.
> >>
> >> So OpenSM is seeing dropped packets? With 4 SMP's on the wire? I do see some
> >> VL15Dropped errors (maybe 2-3 a day) but I did not think that would be an
> >> issue. What kind of rate are you seeing?
> >>
> >> The other question is; do people regularly run the tools which are using
> >> libibnetdisc (ibqueryerrors, iblinkinfo, ibnetdiscover)? We do. If others
> >> are not then I would say this change would have less impact as they would want
> >> the diags to have some priority for debugging. The other option is to change
> >> the patch to be a default of 2 and allow user to change it depending on what
> >> they are trying to do. If you think that is best I will change the patch.
> >>
> >> Ira
> >>
> >> >
> >> > -- Hal
> >> >
> >> > > Ira
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -- Hal
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The first patch converts the algorithm and the second adds the ibnd_set_max_smps_on_wire call.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Let me know what you think. Because the algorithm changed so much testing this is a bit difficult because the order of the node discovery is different. However, I have done some extensive diffing of the output of ibnetdiscover and things look good.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Ira
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > Ira Weiny
> >> > >> > Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
> >> > >> > Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> >> > >> > 925-423-8008
> >> > >> > weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> >> > >> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >> > >> > More majordomo info at http://***vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> >> > >> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >> > >> More majordomo info at http://***vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Ira Weiny
> >> > > Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
> >> > > Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> >> > > 925-423-8008
> >> > > weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ira Weiny
> >> Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
> >> Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> >> 925-423-8008
> >> weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ira Weiny
> > Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
> > Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> > 925-423-8008
> > weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
> >
>
--
Ira Weiny
Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-06 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 0:45 [PATCH 0/2] Using multi-smps on the wire in libibnetdisc Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100202164514.bf2b152a.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-04 14:19 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231002040619y34784bauec6a25d31e7d229b-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-04 18:00 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100204100045.4d2aa9aa.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-04 20:01 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231002041201y2b48aa30nc33d2816ed11b1bf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 0:13 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100204161325.c4481bfe.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 2:18 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100204181852.f175d968.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 12:27 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231002050427r37d326b4w4c188e30992579ac-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-06 1:03 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2010-02-05 12:24 ` Hal Rosenstock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100205170326.699f7e64.weiny2@llnl.gov \
--to=weiny2-i2bct+ncu+m@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox