From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Morgenstein Subject: Re: Patch series from Dec 2009 which needs reviewing/applying Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: <201002091920.41978.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <201002041059.09368.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Roland Dreier Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tziporet Koren , vlad-VPRAkNaXOzVS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Monday 08 February 2010 19:09, Roland Dreier wrote: > =A0> [PATCH 0/2] fix SRQ WQE buffer initialization in liblmx4 and in = mlx4_ib > =A0> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01911.html >=20 > This isn't a patch AFAICT. >=20 You are right, it isn't. Generally, when I submit a patch series, I do a [PATCH 0/??] to contain overall explanatory notes. If you would rather I call the submission something else, that is no pr= oblem. What would you like to see in the subject line for an e-mail which intr= oduces a patch series? -Jack -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html