From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: add support of reload net topology file Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:35:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20100302163511.GL13592@me> References: <4B7C0256.7080505@voltaire.com> <20100227152212.GG13592@me> <4B8BDF87.3020107@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8BDF87.3020107-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)" Cc: Doron Shoham , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 17:38 Mon 01 Mar , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: > We can add the trap generation to this patch. > what do you think? I think that if you need this feature than it should be implemented correctly (without assumptions that use can provide a "proper" files), this should include some sort of connected client handling (in case if its port disappear it could be disconnected for example). For me it would seem more like topology "merge" rather then "reload" feature. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html