From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: add support of reload net topology file Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:03:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20100309150323.GJ6026@me> References: <4B7C0256.7080505@voltaire.com> <20100227152212.GG13592@me> <4B8BDF87.3020107@gmail.com> <20100302163511.GL13592@me> <694d48601003081351o2f661356seb17364cf5d734f9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <694d48601003081351o2f661356seb17364cf5d734f9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Eli Dorfman Cc: Doron Shoham , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 23:51 Mon 08 Mar , Eli Dorfman wrote: > > So if we call this option "merge" with local port validation this will > be acceptable? I was about "logical" action. How a command is named is less critical. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html