From: Eli Cohen <eli-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Ralph Campbell <ralph.campbell-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] IB/ipoib: fix dangling pointer references to ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:02:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100328160211.GA19300@mtldesk030.lab.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267729108.3001.83.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:58:27AM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v3] IB/ipoib: fix dangling pointer references to ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path
>
> When using connected mode, ipoib_cm_create_tx() kmallocs a
> struct ipoib_cm_tx which contains pointers to ipoib_neigh and
> ipoib_path. If the paths are flushed or the struct neighbour is
> destroyed, the pointers held by struct ipoib_cm_tx can reference
> freed memory.
>
I could use some more content here as this is quite a large patch.
Anyway below are some comments. I think besides reviewing this patch
we need to make sure it has been checked in real life.
> +/*
> + * Search the list of connections to be started and remove any entries
> + * which match the path being destroyed.
> + *
> + * This should be called with netif_tx_lock_bh() and priv->lock held.
> + */
> +void ipoib_cm_flush_path(struct net_device *dev, struct ipoib_path *path)
> +{
> + struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct ipoib_cm_tx *tx;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(tx, &priv->cm.start_list, list) {
> + tx = list_entry(priv->cm.start_list.next, typeof(*tx), list);
> + if (tx->path == path) {
> + tx->path = NULL;
> + list_del_init(&tx->list);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
Looks to me like we may find struct ipoib_cm_tx objects hanging and
not freed. This could happen if they were just added to start_list and
removed by ipoib_cm_flush_path() before being processed by
ipoib_cm_tx_start().
> -static int __path_add(struct net_device *dev, struct ipoib_path *path)
> +static void __path_add(struct net_device *dev, struct ipoib_path *path)
> {
> struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> struct rb_node **n = &priv->path_tree.rb_node;
> @@ -249,44 +252,26 @@ static int __path_add(struct net_device *dev, struct ipoib_path *path)
> n = &pn->rb_left;
> else if (ret > 0)
> n = &pn->rb_right;
> - else
> - return -EEXIST;
> + else /* Should never happen since we always search first */
> + return;
> }
Why not remove the last else and change the "else if" into else?
> }
> @@ -460,19 +446,13 @@ static void path_rec_completion(int status,
> memcpy(&neigh->dgid.raw, &path->pathrec.dgid.raw,
> sizeof(union ib_gid));
>
> - if (ipoib_cm_enabled(dev, neigh->neighbour)) {
> - if (!ipoib_cm_get(neigh))
> - ipoib_cm_set(neigh, ipoib_cm_create_tx(dev,
> - path,
> - neigh));
> - if (!ipoib_cm_get(neigh)) {
> - list_del(&neigh->list);
> - if (neigh->ah)
> - ipoib_put_ah(neigh->ah);
> - ipoib_neigh_free(dev, neigh);
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
ipoib_cm_set() is called only once in neigh_alloc(), setting neigh->cm
to NULL, and never again so all calls to ipoib_cm_get() will return
NULL.
> + /*
> + * If connected mode is enabled but not started,
> + * start getting a connection.
> + */
> + if (ipoib_cm_enabled(dev, neigh->neighbour) &&
> + !ipoib_cm_get(neigh))
> + ipoib_cm_create_tx(dev, path, neigh);
>
> while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&neigh->queue)))
> __skb_queue_tail(&skqueue, skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-28 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 18:58 [PATCH v3] IB/ipoib: fix dangling pointer references to ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path Ralph Campbell
[not found] ` <1267729108.3001.83.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-28 16:02 ` Eli Cohen [this message]
[not found] ` <20100328160211.GA19300-8YAHvHwT2UEvbXDkjdHOrw/a8Rv0c6iv@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-29 18:03 ` Ralph Campbell
[not found] ` <1269885823.4192.173.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-29 19:03 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100328160211.GA19300@mtldesk030.lab.mtl.com \
--to=eli-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ralph.campbell-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox