public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Hal Rosenstock
	<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:46:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100413104658.GA10830@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100218124933.c018a23d.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>

On 12:49 Thu 18 Feb     , Ira Weiny wrote:
> 
> From: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:33:30 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm
> 
> v3: change DEFAULT_MAX_SMP_ON_WIRE to 2
> 
> 	Allow for multiple SMP's to be on the wire at a single time.  This
> 	algorithm splits the processing of SMP's to a small smp engine which
> 	may be useful to split out in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>

Applied. Thanks.

However see some comments and questions below.

> +static int recv_port_info(smp_engine_t *engine, ibnd_smp_t * smp,
> +			  uint8_t *mad, void *cb_data)
> +{
> +	ibnd_fabric_t *fabric = ((ibnd_scan_t *)engine->user_data)->fabric;
> +	ibnd_node_t *node = (ibnd_node_t *)cb_data;
> +	ibnd_port_t *port;
> +	uint8_t *port_info = mad + IB_SMP_DATA_OFFS;
> +	uint8_t port_num, local_port;
> +
> +	port_num = mad_get_field(mad, 0, IB_MAD_ATTRMOD_F);
> +	local_port = mad_get_field(port_info, 0, IB_PORT_LOCAL_PORT_F);
> +
> +	/* this may have been created before */
> +	port = node->ports[port_num];
> +	if (!port) {
> +		port = node->ports[port_num] = calloc(1, sizeof(*port));
> +		if (!port) {
> +			IBND_ERROR("Failed to allocate port\n");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	memcpy(port->info, port_info, sizeof(port->info));
> +	port->node = node;
> +	port->portnum = port_num;
> +	port->ext_portnum = 0;
> +	port->base_lid = (uint16_t) mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_LID_F);
> +	port->lmc = (uint8_t) mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_LMC_F);
> +
> +	if (port_num == 0) {
> +		node->smalid = port->base_lid;
> +		node->smalmc = port->lmc;
> +	} else if (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH) {
> +		port->base_lid = node->smalid;
> +		port->lmc = node->smalmc;
> +	}
> +
> +	add_to_portguid_hash(port, fabric->portstbl);
> +
> +	debug_port(&smp->path, port);
>  
> -	mad_dump_node_type(type, 64, &node->type, sizeof(int));
> -	printf("%s -> %s %s {%016" PRIx64 "} portnum %d base lid %d-%d\"%s\"\n",
> -	       portid2str(path), prompt, type, node->guid,
> -	       node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH ? 0 : port->portnum,
> -	       port->base_lid,
> -	       port->base_lid + (1 << port->lmc) - 1, node->nodedesc);
> +	if (port_num &&
> +	    (mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_PHYS_STATE_F)
> +	    == IB_PORT_PHYS_STATE_LINKUP)
> +		&&
> +	    (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH || node == fabric->from_node)) {

What will happen when ibnetdiscover runs from host connected by two
ports to different subnets? Wouldn't it run over both fabrics (following
PortInfo querying loop in recv_node_info() below)?

> +
> +		ib_portid_t path = smp->path;
> +		if (extend_dpath(engine, &path, port_num) != -1)
> +			query_node_info(engine, &path, node);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

[snip]

> +static int recv_node_info(smp_engine_t *engine, ibnd_smp_t * smp,
> +			  uint8_t *mad, void *cb_data)
> +{
> +	ibnd_fabric_t *fabric = ((ibnd_scan_t *)engine->user_data)->fabric;
> +	int i = 0;
> +	uint8_t *node_info = mad + IB_SMP_DATA_OFFS;
> +	ibnd_node_t * rem_node = (ibnd_node_t *)cb_data;
>  	ibnd_node_t *node;
> +	int node_is_new = 0;
> +	uint64_t node_guid = mad_get_field64(node_info, 0, IB_NODE_GUID_F);
> +	uint64_t port_guid = mad_get_field64(node_info, 0, IB_NODE_PORT_GUID_F);
> +	int port_num = mad_get_field(node_info, 0, IB_NODE_LOCAL_PORT_F);
> +	ibnd_port_t *port = NULL;
>  
> -	for (node = fabric->nodestbl[hash]; node; node = node->htnext)
> -		if (node->guid == new->guid)
> -			return node;
> +	node = ibnd_find_node_guid(fabric, node_guid);
> +	if (!node) {
> +		node = create_node(engine, &smp->path, node_info);
> +		if (!node)
> +			return -1;
> +		node_is_new = 1;
> +	}
> +	IBND_DEBUG("Found %s node GUID %lx (%s)\n",
> +		   (node_is_new) ? "new": "old", node->guid,
> +		   portid2str(&smp->path));
>  
> -	return NULL;
> +	port = node->ports[port_num];
> +	if (!port) {
> +		/* If we have not see this port before create a shell for it */
> +		port = node->ports[port_num] = calloc(1, sizeof(*port));
> +		port->node = node;
> +		port->portnum = port_num;
> +	}
> +	port->guid = port_guid;
> +
> +	if (rem_node == NULL) /* this is the start node */
> +		fabric->from_node = node;
> +	else {
> +		/* link ports... */
> +		int rem_port_num = get_last_port(&smp->path);
> +
> +		if (!rem_node->ports[rem_port_num]) {
> +			IBND_ERROR("Internal Error; "
> +				   "Node(%p) %lx Port %d no port created!?!?!?\n\n",
> +				   rem_node, rem_node->guid, rem_port_num);
> +			return (-1);
> +		}
> +
> +		link_ports(node, port, rem_node, rem_node->ports[rem_port_num]);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!node_is_new)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	query_node_desc(engine, &smp->path, node);
> +
> +	if (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH)
> +		query_switch_info(engine, &smp->path, node);
> +
> +	/* process all the ports on this node */
> +	for (i = (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH) ? 0 : 1;
> +		i <= node->numports; i++) {
> +			query_port_info(engine, &smp->path, node, i);
> +	}

This one.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

[snip]

> diff --git a/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/internal.h b/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/internal.h
> index 348bd0f..61b644d 100644
> --- a/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/internal.h
> +++ b/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/internal.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #define _INTERNAL_H_
>  
>  #include <infiniband/ibnetdisc.h>
> +#include <complib/cl_qmap.h>

I'm not really happy with complib dependency introduction - we had an
issues with it in the past.

Also I think that we can implement simpler transaction tracker (likely
even more efficient) by storing sent MADs in cyclic array and encoding
its index as part of TRID.

>  
>  #define	IBND_DEBUG(fmt, ...) \
>  	if (ibdebug) { \
> @@ -52,16 +53,44 @@
>  
>  #define MAXHOPS         63
>  
> -typedef struct ibnd_node_scan {
> -	ibnd_node_t *node;
> -	struct ibnd_node_scan *dnext;	/* nodesdist next */
> -} ibnd_node_scan_t;
> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_SMP_ON_WIRE 2
>  
>  typedef struct ibnd_scan {
> -	ibnd_node_scan_t *nodesdist[MAXHOPS + 1];
>  	ib_portid_t selfportid;
> +	ibnd_fabric_t *fabric;
>  } ibnd_scan_t;
>  
> +
> +typedef struct ibnd_smp ibnd_smp_t;
> +typedef struct smp_engine smp_engine_t;
> +typedef int (*smp_comp_cb_t)(smp_engine_t *engine, ibnd_smp_t * smp,
> +			     uint8_t *mad_resp, void *cb_data);
> +struct ibnd_smp {
> +	cl_map_item_t on_wire;
> +	struct ibnd_smp * qnext;
> +	smp_comp_cb_t cb;
> +	void * cb_data;
> +	ib_portid_t path;
> +	ib_rpc_t rpc;
> +};
> +struct smp_engine {
> +	struct ibmad_port *ibmad_port;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp_queue_head;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp_queue_tail;
> +	void * user_data;
> +	cl_qmap_t smps_on_wire;
> +	int num_smps_outstanding;
> +	int max_smps_on_wire;
> +};
> +
> +void smp_engine_init(smp_engine_t * engine, struct ibmad_port *ibmad_port,
> +		     void * user_data, int max_smps_on_wire);
> +int issue_smp(smp_engine_t *engine, ib_portid_t * portid,
> +	      unsigned attrid, unsigned mod,
> +	      smp_comp_cb_t cb, void * cb_data);
> +int process_mads(smp_engine_t *engine);
> +void smp_engine_destroy(smp_engine_t *engine);
> +
>  void add_to_nodeguid_hash(ibnd_node_t * node, ibnd_node_t * hash[]);
>  
>  void add_to_portguid_hash(ibnd_port_t * port, ibnd_port_t * hash[]);
> diff --git a/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/query_smp.c b/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/query_smp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5571314
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc/src/query_smp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> + *
> + * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
> + * licenses.  You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
> + * General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
> + * COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the
> + * OpenIB.org BSD license below:
> + *
> + *     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
> + *     without modification, are permitted provided that the following
> + *     conditions are met:
> + *
> + *      - Redistributions of source code must retain the above
> + *        copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
> + *        disclaimer.
> + *
> + *      - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
> + *        copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
> + *        disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials
> + *        provided with the distribution.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> + * MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
> + * BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
> + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
> + * CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
> + * SOFTWARE.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <infiniband/ibnetdisc.h>
> +#include <infiniband/umad.h>
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +void
> +queue_smp(smp_engine_t *engine, ibnd_smp_t *smp)
> +{
> +	smp->qnext = NULL;
> +	if (!engine->smp_queue_head) {
> +		engine->smp_queue_head = smp;
> +		engine->smp_queue_tail = smp;
> +	} else {
> +		engine->smp_queue_tail->qnext = smp;
> +		engine->smp_queue_tail = smp;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +ibnd_smp_t *
> +get_smp(smp_engine_t *engine)
> +{
> +	ibnd_smp_t *head = engine->smp_queue_head;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *tail = engine->smp_queue_tail;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *rc = head;
> +	if (head) {
> +		if (tail == head)
> +			engine->smp_queue_tail = NULL;
> +		engine->smp_queue_head = head->qnext;
> +	}
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int send_smp(ibnd_smp_t * smp, struct ibmad_port *srcport)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	uint8_t umad[1024];
> +	ib_rpc_t *rpc = &smp->rpc;
> +
> +	memset(umad, 0, umad_size() + IB_MAD_SIZE);
> +
> +	if ((rc = mad_build_pkt(umad, &smp->rpc, &smp->path, NULL, NULL))
> +	    < 0) {
> +		IBND_ERROR("mad_build_pkt failed; %d", rc);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((rc = umad_send(mad_rpc_portid(srcport),
> +			    mad_rpc_class_agent(srcport, rpc->mgtclass),
> +			    umad, IB_MAD_SIZE,
> +			    mad_get_timeout(srcport, rpc->timeout),
> +			    mad_get_retries(srcport))) < 0) {
> +		IBND_ERROR("send failed; %d", rc);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int process_smp_queue(smp_engine_t *engine)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp;
> +	while (cl_qmap_count(&engine->smps_on_wire) < engine->max_smps_on_wire) {
> +		smp = get_smp(engine);
> +		if (!smp)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		cl_qmap_insert(&engine->smps_on_wire, (uint32_t)smp->rpc.trid,
> +			       (cl_map_item_t *)smp);
> +		if ((rc = send_smp(smp, engine->ibmad_port)) != 0)
> +			return rc;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int issue_smp(smp_engine_t *engine, ib_portid_t * portid,
> +	      unsigned attrid, unsigned mod,
> +	      smp_comp_cb_t cb, void * cb_data)
> +{
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp = calloc(1, sizeof *smp);
> +	if (!smp) {
> +		IBND_ERROR("OOM");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	smp->cb = cb;
> +	smp->cb_data = cb_data;
> +	smp->path = *portid;
> +	smp->rpc.method = IB_MAD_METHOD_GET;
> +	smp->rpc.attr.id = attrid;
> +	smp->rpc.attr.mod = mod;
> +	smp->rpc.timeout = mad_get_timeout(engine->ibmad_port, 0);
> +	smp->rpc.datasz = IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE;
> +	smp->rpc.dataoffs = IB_SMP_DATA_OFFS;
> +	smp->rpc.trid = mad_trid();

BTW, by reviewing mad_trid() code in libibmad:

uint64_t mad_trid(void)
{
	static uint64_t base;
	static uint64_t trid;
	uint64_t next;

	if (!base) {
		srandom((int)time(0) * getpid());
		base = random();
		trid = random();
	}
	next = ++trid | (base << 32);
	return next;
}

For me it doesn't look as thread safe function.

> +
> +	if ((portid->lid <= 0) ||
> +	    (portid->drpath.drslid == 0xffff) ||
> +	    (portid->drpath.drdlid == 0xffff))
> +		smp->rpc.mgtclass = IB_SMI_DIRECT_CLASS; /* direct SMI */
> +	else
> +		smp->rpc.mgtclass = IB_SMI_CLASS; /* Lid routed SMI */
> +
> +	portid->sl = 0;
> +	portid->qp = 0;
> +
> +	engine->num_smps_outstanding++;
> +	queue_smp(engine, smp);
> +	return (process_smp_queue(engine));
> +}
> +
> +int process_one_recv(smp_engine_t *engine)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	int status = 0;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp;
> +	uint8_t *mad;
> +	uint32_t trid;
> +	uint8_t umad[umad_size() + IB_MAD_SIZE];
> +	int length = umad_size() + IB_MAD_SIZE;
> +
> +	memset(umad, 0, sizeof(umad));
> +
> +	/* wait for the next message */
> +	if ((rc = umad_recv(mad_rpc_portid(engine->ibmad_port), umad, &length,
> +			    0)) < 0) {
> +		if (rc == -EWOULDBLOCK)
> +			return 0;
> +		IBND_ERROR("umad_recv failed: %d\n", rc);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = process_smp_queue(engine);
> +
> +	mad = umad_get_mad(umad);
> +	trid = (uint32_t)mad_get_field64(mad, 0, IB_MAD_TRID_F);
> +
> +	smp = (ibnd_smp_t *)cl_qmap_remove(&engine->smps_on_wire, trid);
> +	if ((cl_map_item_t *)smp == cl_qmap_end(&engine->smps_on_wire)) {
> +		IBND_ERROR("Failed to find matching smp for trid (%x)\n",
> +			   trid);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	if ((status = umad_status(umad))) {
> +		IBND_ERROR("umad (%s Attr 0x%x:%u) bad status %d; %s\n",
> +			portid2str(&smp->path),
> +			smp->rpc.attr.id, smp->rpc.attr.mod,
> +			status, strerror(status));
> +	} else if ((status = mad_get_field(mad, 0, IB_DRSMP_STATUS_F))) {
> +			IBND_ERROR("mad (%s Attr 0x%x:%u) bad status 0x%x\n",
> +				   portid2str(&smp->path),
> +				   smp->rpc.attr.id, smp->rpc.attr.mod,
> +				   status);
> +	} else
> +		rc = smp->cb(engine, smp, mad, smp->cb_data);
> +
> +error:
> +	free(smp);
> +	engine->num_smps_outstanding--;
> +	return (rc);
> +}
> +
> +void smp_engine_init(smp_engine_t * engine, struct ibmad_port *ibmad_port,
> +		     void * user_data, int max_smps_on_wire)
> +{
> +	memset(engine, '\0', sizeof(*engine));
> +	engine->ibmad_port = ibmad_port;
> +	engine->user_data = user_data;
> +	cl_qmap_init(&engine->smps_on_wire);
> +	engine->num_smps_outstanding = 0;
> +	engine->max_smps_on_wire = max_smps_on_wire;
> +}
> +
> +void smp_engine_destroy(smp_engine_t *engine)
> +{
> +	cl_map_item_t *item;
> +	ibnd_smp_t *smp;
> +
> +	/* remove queued smps */
> +	smp = get_smp(engine);
> +	if (smp)
> +		IBND_ERROR("outstanding SMP's\n");
> +	for (/* */; smp; smp = get_smp(engine)) {
> +		free(smp);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* remove smps from the wire queue */
> +	item = cl_qmap_head(&engine->smps_on_wire);
> +	if (item != cl_qmap_end(&engine->smps_on_wire))
> +		IBND_ERROR("outstanding SMP's on wire\n");
> +	for (/* */; item != cl_qmap_end(&engine->smps_on_wire);
> +	     item = cl_qmap_head(&engine->smps_on_wire)) {
> +		cl_qmap_remove_item(&engine->smps_on_wire, item);
> +		free(item);
> +	}
> +
> +	engine->num_smps_outstanding = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int process_mads(smp_engine_t *engine)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	while (engine->num_smps_outstanding > 0) {
> +		if ((rc = process_smp_queue(engine)) != 0)
> +			return rc;

Is it really needed to run process_smp_queue() here (assuming that it is
already executed in issue_smp() and process_one_recv())? Or this is just
for handling process_one_recv() error case? If so wouldn't it better to
run it there?

Sasha

> +		while (!cl_is_qmap_empty(&engine->smps_on_wire))
> +			if ((rc = process_one_recv(engine)) != 0)
> +				return rc;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> -- 
> 1.5.4.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-13 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-18 20:49 [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm Ira Weiny
     [not found] ` <20100218124933.c018a23d.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-13 10:46   ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
2010-04-13 13:25     ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 20:30       ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]         ` <20100413133028.b55a0cb1.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14  9:58           ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-23  2:12       ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]         ` <20100422191231.bf6021fb.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-07 20:50           ` Sasha Khapyorsky
     [not found]             ` <20100507205052.GW7099-o14lFNPAa+WKTadZzrrH2Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-10 20:53               ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]                 ` <20100510135353.257d76c0.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-11 16:42                   ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-05-11 23:44                     ` Ira Weiny
2010-04-13 16:53     ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 16:58       ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: don't try to cross discovery over CA Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 17:07     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm Ira Weiny
2010-04-13 17:18     ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 18:24       ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]         ` <20100413112412.de66586d.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14  9:59           ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: don't query CA ports not connected to a fabric Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 16:38   ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix outstanding SMPs countung Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 20:38     ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]       ` <20100413133826.00a8afc5.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-13 20:44         ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]           ` <20100413134446.72eb336a.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 10:23             ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-14 16:52               ` Ira Weiny
     [not found]                 ` <0EEE4F40-F1DD-46A6-B756-3C46DA06B403-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-16 12:05                   ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-16 12:21                     ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix memory leak in case of send_smps() failure Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 15:49                     ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix outstanding SMPs countung Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 15:56                       ` [PATCH] libibnetdiscover: more outstanding MADs counting fix Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 16:03                         ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: remove not needed process_smp_queue() call Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 16:10                           ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: remove not needed num_smps_outstanding counter Sasha Khapyorsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100413104658.GA10830@me \
    --to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox