From: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
To: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Hal Rosenstock
<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:44:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511164458.2797a4cb.weiny2@llnl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511164234.GF28549@me>
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:42:34 -0700
Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 13:53 Mon 10 May , Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > >
> > > > int ibnd_discover_fabric(ibnd_fabric_t **fabric,
> > > > cosnt char *ca_name, <== could we even default this?
> > >
> > > I would think about ca_name and port_number. And this is of course may
> > > have default (NULL, 0).
> >
> > Ok, ca_name and ca_port will be explicit.
> >
> > >
> > > > struct ibnd_config *cfg);
> > >
> > > What is wrong with current ibdn_fabric_t *ibnd_discover_fabric(...)? Why
> > > do we need an extra parameter?
> >
> > Well we are breaking the interface again so I figure we might as well clean some things up. Returning an int allows us to have a reason for the failure returned to the caller rather than just "NULL". We have cleaned up most of the internals of the library to allow for this.
>
> But we want to keep API simple, no?
Ok, patch to follow.
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't mind the ibnd_config_t struct but I don't think it should be visible
> > > > to the user. Make it opaque and use "set" functions. Something like.
> > > >
> > > > ibnd_fabric_t *fabric;
> > > > ibnd_config_t cfg;
> > > > ib_portid_t * from;
> > > >
> > > > ibnd_set_hops(&cfg, hops); <== default -1
> > > > ibnd_set_port_num(&cfg, port_num); <== default 1
> > > > ibnd_set_max_smps(&cfg, max_smps); <== default 2
> > > > ibnd_set_from_node(&cfg, from); <== default NULL
> > >
> > > I would prefer to not complicate API with ibnd_set_this() helpers. It
> > > would be necessary to add new ones in the future which will lead to API
> > > changes.
> >
> > See below.
> >
> > >
> > > > if (ibnd_discover_fabric(&fabric, "foo", &cfg)) { <== anything not in cfg is
> > > > defaulted here
> > > > fprintf(stderr, "Wow it failed\n");
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This allows us to change ibnd_config structure any time we want without
> > > > affecting the API. I don't think the "pad" you used is a good idea.
> > >
> > > Without padding we will break ABI each time when new field is added to
> > > the config structure.
> >
> > No it does not iff you use the ibnd_set_this() helpers and make the config private.
>
> In you example 'ibnd_config_t cfg' is on the stack... :)
yes, bad example.
>
> I would really suggest to keep API simple and useful - to fill up
> a structure described in header files is much simpler than pass over
> various helpers calls.
I disagree but since you are looking to branch I think this bug needs to be fixed.
A patch is following this email,
Ira
>
> Sasha
>
> >
> > >
> > > > Also since we are breaking the API we might as well return the fabric as a
> > > > parameter and have an error code. But I could go either way on this one.
> > > >
> > > > Ira
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [*] query_smp.c probably should have it's own timeout here but we can discuss
> > > > later.
> > > >
> > > > [#] What sucks about this is that libibmad already has the functionality to
> > > > open the umad port and configure it (50 line function). Now we will be
> > > > duplicating this functionality.
> > >
> > > I think you can use mad_rpc_open_port(ca_name, port_number, ...) just
> > > fine (and so the rest of libibmad stuff) - it will open separate fd.
> >
> > Yes for the libibmad functionality we can do that. I was speaking of the use of the umad layer. To use that layer we have to duplicate the functionality of mad_rpc_open_port in every tool which requires umad layer access, correct? Right now we are mixing the 2 layers (mad and umad) in saquery (get_bind_handle) as well as libibnetdisc.
> >
> > I think we need to be careful we don't do this again!
> >
> > Ira
> >
> > >
> > > Sasha
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://**vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ira Weiny
> > Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
> > Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> > 925-423-8008
> > weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://*vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Ira Weiny
Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-11 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 20:49 [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100218124933.c018a23d.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-13 10:46 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 13:25 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 20:30 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100413133028.b55a0cb1.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 9:58 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-23 2:12 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100422191231.bf6021fb.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-07 20:50 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
[not found] ` <20100507205052.GW7099-o14lFNPAa+WKTadZzrrH2Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-10 20:53 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100510135353.257d76c0.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-11 16:42 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-05-11 23:44 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2010-04-13 16:53 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 16:58 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: don't try to cross discovery over CA Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] libibnetdisc: Convert to a multi-smp algorithm Ira Weiny
2010-04-13 17:18 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 18:24 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100413112412.de66586d.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 9:59 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: don't query CA ports not connected to a fabric Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 16:38 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix outstanding SMPs countung Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 20:38 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100413133826.00a8afc5.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-13 20:44 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20100413134446.72eb336a.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 10:23 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-14 16:52 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <0EEE4F40-F1DD-46A6-B756-3C46DA06B403-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-16 12:05 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-16 12:21 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix memory leak in case of send_smps() failure Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 15:49 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: fix outstanding SMPs countung Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 15:56 ` [PATCH] libibnetdiscover: more outstanding MADs counting fix Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 16:03 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: remove not needed process_smp_queue() call Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-18 16:10 ` [PATCH] libibnetdisc: remove not needed num_smps_outstanding counter Sasha Khapyorsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100511164458.2797a4cb.weiny2@llnl.gov \
--to=weiny2-i2bct+ncu+m@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox