Re: [PATCH] opensm: Add a rate based mechanism for SMP transactions

Hal Rosenstock
2010-06-02T18:09:19Z

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 11:36 Wed 02 Jun     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> I'm saying that I think the approach proposed in the original patch is
>> better as it doesn't waste CPU although it's more complex.
>
> How do you see this, the code is almost equivalent in vl15_poller()?

It's been so long I misremembered :-( I had mistakenly thought there
were two ranges/timeouts in use in the original patch.

-- Hal