From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm: Add a rate based mechanism for SMP transactions Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:00:29 +0300 Message-ID: <20100602160029.GH28549@me> References: <20091216151115.GA22639@comcast.net> <20100601153234.GR28549@me> <20100602153106.GG28549@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Yevgeny Kliteynik List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 11:36 Wed 02 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > I'm saying that I think the approach proposed in the original patch is > better as it doesn't waste CPU although it's more complex. How do you see this, the code is almost equivalent in vl15_poller()? Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html