Re: [PATCH] ibnetdiscover: add '-f' flag to show full information (ports' speed and width).

[Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 17:18 Tue 31 Aug     , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote:
> Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > On 09:45 Tue 24 Aug     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>> What about the flag? do we still need it if we pass the output after the comment?
> >> I wouldn't think so. I also think we've made commentary changes to the
> >> ibnetdiscover output format like this before. If we wanted to be
> >> absolutely sure it wouldn't break anything, we'd keep the flag though.
> >> It's up to Sasha.
> > 
> > The '-f' flag could make sense since those information actually
> > duplicates previous 4xDDR, etc. and used by ibsim's parser only.
> > 
> > Also it would be nice to make ibsim's parser to understand both
> > possibilities: s=2 and speed=2 (Or even to parse "*x*DR" strings :))
> 
> Is it valid to assume that "*x*DR" string is always the last token?

I think that it would be better to not assume this.

Sasha

> If so, the patch should be changed
> 
> Eli
> > 
> > Sasha
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html