From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make multicast and path record queue flexible. Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:28:33 -0600 Message-ID: <20101005162833.GC5967@obsidianresearch.com> References: <4CAB4D49.9090107@voltaire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CAB4D49.9090107-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Aleksey Senin Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "ewg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org" , Roland Dreier , Moni Shoua List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:07:37PM +0200, Aleksey Senin wrote: > When using slow SM allow more packets to be buffered before answer > comming back. This patch based on idea of Christoph Lameter. > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2009-June/059853.html IMHO, I think it is better to send multicasts to the broadcast MLID than to queue them.. More like ethernet that way. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html