From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Netes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] opensm/osm_state_mgr.c: Don't rely on PortInfo:PortState for base SP0 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:22:43 +0300 Message-ID: <20110421122243.GA2137@calypso.voltaire.com> References: <4DAC3CCC.4090101@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20110420141713.GD28761@calypso.voltaire.com> <4DAEF103.1000706@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DAEF103.1000706-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 10:43 Wed 20 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 4/20/2011 10:17 AM, Alex Netes wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > > > On 09:29 Mon 18 Apr , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> For base SP0, PortState in SM PortInfo attribute is not used and base SP0 > >> is always "active". > > > > How SM can be attached to base SP0? > > What precludes this ? AFAIK SM can run on any switch port 0 whether > enhanced or base. > I'm probably missing something. Base Switch Port 0 - A Switch Port 0 which is not an Endport (IBTA p71). If you look further, Endport defined as a Port which can be a destination of LID-routed communication within the same Subnet as the sender. How can SM be attached to a port which isn't an Endport? -- Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html