From: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
To: Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: races in ipathfs
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:45:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120318184547.GA6814@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120119202003.GZ23916-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:20:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Use of qib_super is seriously racy. qibfs_add() (and worse,
> qibfs_remove()) can happen during qibfs_mount() and qibfs_kill_super().
[snip]
FWIW, I've put a completely untested patchset into
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git qibfs
It tries to avoid that kind of crap by getting rid of "populate at mount
time" logics - we keep (internal) mount of that sucker for as long as
there are any devices owned by ib_qib, adding them on add_device() and
removing on remove_device(). The only complication is with module
use counts - that fs has to be a separate module, or we'll have ib_qib
impossible to rmmod, because fs keeps its module pinned and any devices
held by ib_qib PCI driver will keep the fs pinned, so we never get
to unregistering said PCI driver. With skeleton of qibfs (static parts
only) taken to ib_qib_fs.c we avoid that problem - it is what ends up
being pinned down for as long as ib_qib owns any devices, but then it's
pinned down by ib_qib using exports from ib_qib_fs anyway. And once
ib_qib is removed, all internal references to that vfsmount and superblock
disappear as well...
This stuff is completely untested; I don't have the hardware in question.
It does compile and survive modpost, but that's it. Please, review and
comment...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-18 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 20:20 races in ipathfs Al Viro
[not found] ` <20120119202003.GZ23916-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-20 13:55 ` Mike Marciniszyn
2012-03-18 18:45 ` Al Viro [this message]
[not found] ` <20120318184547.GA6814-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-18 22:40 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120318184547.GA6814@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro-3bdd1+5odreifsdqtta3olvcufugdwfn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=infinipath-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox