linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20, v4] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:25:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120828122528.GB28144@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503C97AC.9060703@acm.org>

Hi Bart,

On 28.08.2012 10:04, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/27/12 18:37, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > while testing ib_srp based on your srp-ha,
> > we sometimes hit kernel crashes with the call trace below.
> > 
> > How to reproduce:
> > 
> > 0. Kernel 3.2.15 with SCST v4193 on the target,
> >    Kernel 3.2.8 with ib_srp-ha on the initiator.
> > 1. Configure 500+ vdisks on target, and get initiator connected.
> > 2. Exchange data intensively, which works well.
> > 3. (On initiator) delete SRP remote port occasionally, e.g.
> >    # echo "1" > /sys/class/srp_remote_ports/port-6\:1/delete
> >    And configure again the SRP target.
> > 4. (On target) disable Infiniband interface, and enable it again.
> > 5. Repeat 3 and 4.
> > 
> > Then the initiator's kernel suddenly crashes. (but not always)
> > 
> > Do you have any idea why?
> 
> Hello Dongsu,
> 
> That's unfortunate. I've just finished running the above test 1000 times
> on my test setup. The test ran perfectly - login succeeded every time,
> the test finished in the expected time, no kernel crash did occur and no
> memory was leaked. I've been running my test with kernel 3.6-rc3 instead
> of kernel 3.2.8 though. Can you repeat your test with kernel 3.6-rc3 on
> the initiator system instead of kernel 3.2.8 ? The 3.6-rc3 kernel
> contains multiple patches that improve robustness with regard to SCSI
> device removal.

Ok, when I get a chance to set up a new test system with kernel 3.6-rc3,
I'll do a new test and let you know.

By the way, as long as I've observed today, the crash occurs only if
rport_dev_loss_timedout() is called. It means, without device loss,
a simple rport_delete does not make any crash.

Is that probably because arguments to pr_err() are accessing to invalid
addresses?

drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c:275

        pr_err("SRP transport: dev_loss_tmo (%ds) expired - removing %s.\n",
               rport->dev_loss_tmo, dev_name(&rport->dev));

Cheers,
Dongsu


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-28 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-09 15:41 [PATCH 00/20, v4] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
     [not found] ` <5023DA39.7020000-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-09 15:43   ` [PATCH 01/20] ib_srp: Fix a race condition Bart Van Assche
     [not found]     ` <5023DAA1.1040507-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-14  3:19       ` David Dillow
     [not found]         ` <1344914386.31833.45.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-14 13:21           ` Bart Van Assche
2012-08-14 13:18       ` [PATCH 01/20 v4b] " Bart Van Assche
     [not found]         ` <502A503D.5030604-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-15  0:03           ` David Dillow
2012-08-09 15:44   ` [PATCH 02/20] ib_srp: Enlarge block layer timeout Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:45   ` [PATCH 03/20] ib_srp: Move QP state check into srp_send_tsk_mgmt() Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:47   ` [PATCH 04/20] ib_srp: Stop queueing if QP in error Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:48   ` [PATCH 05/20] ib_srp: Eliminate state SRP_TARGET_CONNECTING Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:48   ` [PATCH 06/20] ib_srp: Suppress superfluous error messages Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:49   ` [PATCH 07/20] ib_srp: Avoid that SCSI error handling triggers a crash Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:50   ` [PATCH 08/20] ib_srp: Introduce the helper function, srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:51   ` [PATCH 09/20] ib_srp: Eliminate state SRP_TARGET_DEAD Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:52   ` [PATCH 10/20] ib_srp: Keep processing commands during scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:53   ` [PATCH 11/20] ib_srp: Make srp_disconnect_target() wait for IB completions Bart Van Assche
     [not found]     ` <5023DCFF.4020709-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-23 15:59       ` Sebastian Riemer
     [not found]         ` <5036536B.1000003-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-23 16:43           ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]             ` <50365DC3.1050807-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-24 10:42               ` Dongsu Park
2012-08-09 15:54   ` [PATCH 12/20] ib_srp: Document sysfs attributes Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:56   ` [PATCH 13/20] srp_transport: Fix atttribute registration Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:58   ` [PATCH 15/20] srp_transport: Document sysfs attributes Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 15:59   ` [PATCH 16/20] ib_srp: Allow SRP disconnect through sysfs Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 16:00   ` [PATCH 17/20] ib_srp: Introduce a temporary variable in srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 16:01   ` [PATCH 18/20] ib_srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 16:02   ` [PATCH 19/20] srp_transport: Add transport layer error handling Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 16:04   ` [PATCH 20/20] ib_srp: Add dev_loss_tmo support Bart Van Assche
2012-08-27 18:37   ` [PATCH 00/20, v4] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Dongsu Park
2012-08-28 10:04     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-08-28 12:25       ` Dongsu Park [this message]
2012-08-28 12:58         ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-25 15:05   ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-27  0:31     ` David Dillow
     [not found]       ` <1348705896.26028.3.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-23 15:07         ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]           ` <50AF9146.5000405-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-26  4:47             ` David Dillow
2012-08-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 14/20] srp_transport: Simplify attribute initialization code Bart Van Assche
2012-08-09 16:18 ` [PATCH 00/20, v4] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
     [not found]   ` <5023E2E3.4030602-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-11  8:29     ` Joseph Glanville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120828122528.GB28144@gmail.com \
    --to=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).