From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: isert for mellanox drivers Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:03:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20140425060315.GA26232@infradead.org> References: <5DD781F004516D4BBC46D51FA58794102D464FFB@CMEXMB1.ad.emulex.com> <5358B396.4060904@mellanox.com> <20140424070804.GA20442@infradead.org> <5358DF60.9010202@mellanox.com> <20140425053825.GB9435@infradead.org> <20140425055508.GB23896@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140425055508.GB23896@obsidianresearch.com> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: sagi grimberg , "tony.seo@samsung.com" , Alex Leung , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel , Or Gerlitz , Oren Duer , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:55:08PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Official OFA OFED is now strictly backports from a given kernel > verison, and TBH, is not widely used now that everything is included > in the modern distros. > > The vendor 'OFEDs' remain a big pile. I'm not even sure source is > proved for them.. At least it isn't readily apparent. > > IMHO, the vendors should not be co-opting the OFED branding, but that > is a whole other topic.... Thanks for the clarification Jason! I'll take back my rant and will apply it to the vendors instead :)