From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 09/10] IB/mlx4: Add timestamp_mask and hca_core_clock to query_device Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:29:15 -0600 Message-ID: <20150520002915.GD16941@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1431869786-6308-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1431869786-6308-10-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <20150519185801.GM18675@obsidianresearch.com> <20150519190031.GN18675@obsidianresearch.com> <20150519191553.GP18675@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Or Gerlitz , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Amir Vadai , Tal Alon , Matan Barak , Yann Droneaud List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30:00PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Are you objecting adding the clock frequency and mask to the qeury device verb? > why? Lets see the verbs side and I'll let you know. > If not, are objecting using the vendor specific track of the verb to > pass from the vendor driver to the vendor library this or that detail > which is needed for proper operation? why? I'm uncomfortable seeing otherwise vendor-neutral calls gain vendor extensions. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html