From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 09/10] IB/mlx4: Add timestamp_mask and hca_core_clock to query_device Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:21:08 -0600 Message-ID: <20150527222108.GA7855@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20150526160624.GA11800@obsidianresearch.com> <20150526185315.GF11800@obsidianresearch.com> <20150526220724.GC4502@obsidianresearch.com> <20150527184856.GA16059@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Amir Vadai , Tal Alon , Matan Barak , Yann Droneaud List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:33:58AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > (2) instantly rejecting a usage of a mechanism existing just for that > use case since the first year of our life (2005) I didn't reject anything, I said I wanted to see the user side to continue my review. > This series is (1) simple compared to other stuff being reviewed here > nowadays, What? It is 11 patches, long, introduces several UAPI changes, does not implement a standardized feature, adds new uses of latent kernel functions and exists to support a unique feature of a single hardware vendor that few understand the usecase for. I would describe this as one of the toughest to review series on patchworks right now. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html