From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] svcrdma: Clean up svc_rdma_get_reply_array()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:45:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709204528.8481.2755.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150709204230.8481.45457.stgit-Hs+gFlyCn65vLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
Kernel coding conventions frown upon having large nontrivial
functions in header files, and the preference these days is to
allow the compiler to make inlining decisions if possible.
As these functions are re-homed into a .c file, be sure that
comparisons with fields in struct rpcrdma_msg are with be32
constants.
This is a refactoring change; no behavior change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h | 81 +--------------------------------
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
index cb94ee4..ca4d86a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
@@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ extern int rdma_read_chunk_frmr(struct svcxprt_rdma *, struct svc_rqst *,
/* svc_rdma_sendto.c */
extern int svc_rdma_sendto(struct svc_rqst *);
+extern struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *
+ svc_rdma_get_read_chunk(struct rpcrdma_msg *);
/* svc_rdma_transport.c */
extern int svc_rdma_send(struct svcxprt_rdma *, struct ib_send_wr *);
@@ -238,83 +240,4 @@ extern void svc_rdma_prep_reply_hdr(struct svc_rqst *);
extern int svc_rdma_init(void);
extern void svc_rdma_cleanup(void);
-/*
- * Returns the address of the first read chunk or <nul> if no read chunk is
- * present
- */
-static inline struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *
-svc_rdma_get_read_chunk(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
-{
- struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *ch =
- (struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0];
-
- if (ch->rc_discrim == 0)
- return NULL;
-
- return ch;
-}
-
-/*
- * Returns the address of the first read write array element or <nul> if no
- * write array list is present
- */
-static inline struct rpcrdma_write_array *
-svc_rdma_get_write_array(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
-{
- if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0] != 0
- || rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1] == 0)
- return NULL;
-
- return (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1];
-}
-
-/*
- * Returns the address of the first reply array element or <nul> if no
- * reply array is present
- */
-static inline struct rpcrdma_write_array *
-svc_rdma_get_reply_array(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
-{
- struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *rch;
- struct rpcrdma_write_array *wr_ary;
- struct rpcrdma_write_array *rp_ary;
-
- /* XXX: Need to fix when reply list may occur with read-list and/or
- * write list */
- if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0] != 0 ||
- rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1] != 0)
- return NULL;
-
- rch = svc_rdma_get_read_chunk(rmsgp);
- if (rch) {
- while (rch->rc_discrim)
- rch++;
-
- /* The reply list follows an empty write array located
- * at 'rc_position' here. The reply array is at rc_target.
- */
- rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)&rch->rc_target;
-
- goto found_it;
- }
-
- wr_ary = svc_rdma_get_write_array(rmsgp);
- if (wr_ary) {
- rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)
- &wr_ary->
- wc_array[ntohl(wr_ary->wc_nchunks)].wc_target.rs_length;
-
- goto found_it;
- }
-
- /* No read list, no write list */
- rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)
- &rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[2];
-
- found_it:
- if (rp_ary->wc_discrim == 0)
- return NULL;
-
- return rp_ary;
-}
#endif
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
index 95412ab..1dfae83 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
@@ -136,6 +136,79 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_map_xdr(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt,
return dma_addr;
}
+/* Returns the address of the first read chunk or <nul> if no read chunk
+ * is present
+ */
+struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *
+svc_rdma_get_read_chunk(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
+{
+ struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *ch =
+ (struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0];
+
+ if (ch->rc_discrim == xdr_zero)
+ return NULL;
+ return ch;
+}
+
+/* Returns the address of the first read write array element or <nul>
+ * if no write array list is present
+ */
+static struct rpcrdma_write_array *
+svc_rdma_get_write_array(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
+{
+ if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0] != xdr_zero ||
+ rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1] == xdr_zero)
+ return NULL;
+ return (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1];
+}
+
+/* Returns the address of the first reply array element or <nul> if no
+ * reply array is present
+ */
+static struct rpcrdma_write_array *
+svc_rdma_get_reply_array(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
+{
+ struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *rch;
+ struct rpcrdma_write_array *wr_ary;
+ struct rpcrdma_write_array *rp_ary;
+
+ /* XXX: Need to fix when reply chunk may occur with read list
+ * and/or write list.
+ */
+ if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0] != xdr_zero ||
+ rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1] != xdr_zero)
+ return NULL;
+
+ rch = svc_rdma_get_read_chunk(rmsgp);
+ if (rch) {
+ while (rch->rc_discrim != xdr_zero)
+ rch++;
+
+ /* The reply chunk follows an empty write array located
+ * at 'rc_position' here. The reply array is at rc_target.
+ */
+ rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)&rch->rc_target;
+ goto found_it;
+ }
+
+ wr_ary = svc_rdma_get_write_array(rmsgp);
+ if (wr_ary) {
+ int chunk = be32_to_cpu(wr_ary->wc_nchunks);
+
+ rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)
+ &wr_ary->wc_array[chunk].wc_target.rs_length;
+ goto found_it;
+ }
+
+ /* No read list, no write list */
+ rp_ary = (struct rpcrdma_write_array *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[2];
+
+ found_it:
+ if (rp_ary->wc_discrim == xdr_zero)
+ return NULL;
+ return rp_ary;
+}
+
/* Assumptions:
* - The specified write_len can be represented in sc_max_sge * PAGE_SIZE
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 20:44 [PATCH v1 0/5] NFS/RDMA server side for Linux 4.3 Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20150709204230.8481.45457.stgit-Hs+gFlyCn65vLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] NFS/RDMA Release resources in svcrdma when device is removed Chuck Lever
2015-07-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] svcrdma: Fix send_reply() scatter/gather set-up Chuck Lever
2015-07-09 20:45 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2015-07-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] svcrdma: Remove svc_rdma_fastreg() Chuck Lever
2015-07-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] svcrdma: Boost NFS READ/WRITE payload size maximum Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20150709204546.8481.65857.stgit-Hs+gFlyCn65vLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-10 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20150710141814.GA31121-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-10 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-07-10 14:59 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <11D08769-F6EB-4696-8910-8B207B20CC10-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-10 15:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20150710155424.GD31121-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-10 15:59 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <24367FE9-7C2B-4B2D-A48A-90329D92296E-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-10 16:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20150710160506.GE31121-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-13 16:40 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150709204528.8481.2755.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net \
--to=chuck.lever-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox