From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RDMA/CM and multiple QPs Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:08:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20150907050842.GA30020@infradead.org> References: <20150906064550.GA30683@infradead.org> <20150906075024.GA7845@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Parav Pandit Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 01:24:52PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Yes. SRP is good example. The point I am trying to make is, SRP > implements failover and request spreading where one QP fails it > delivers to other QP. But SRP doesn't implement that. There are no fail over capabilities in a single SRP session even with multiple QPs, and the spreading is implemented by a higher layer, namely blk-mq, which is common code for all block drivers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html