From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: 4.4's rdma plate Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 23:56:03 -0600 Message-ID: <20151021055603.GA20287@obsidianresearch.com> References: <561E510C.8060501@redhat.com> <56266C4B.1060000@redhat.com> <20151020165237.GC24608@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Matan Barak , Haggai Eran , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Lameter List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:00:54AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > As I wrote below, we should encourage people to take part in upstream > development, and making such comment only after the patch sits on the > list whole two months (V1 was very minor change, V2 was re-spin) isn't > going in the encouragement direction. I would say there are at least 6 people who could meaningfully put a reviewed-by tag on that UAPI patch, why do you think none of them have done so in two months? What is needed to get more engagement in upstream? > I will try to get Reviewed-by: from Haggai or Matan tomorrow, can you > also take a look today, so we don't miss 4.4 just for that? Unlikely, I am very busy with SC|15. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html