From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu>
To: Sunny Kumar <sunny.kumar.roy@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@intel.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sunny Kumar <sunnyk@cdac.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: rdma: hfi1 : Prefer using the BIT macro
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:27:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105132733.GD4023@leon.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446724683-30092-1-git-send-email-sunnyk@cdac.in>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:28:03PM +0530, Sunny Kumar wrote:
> This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar <sunnyk@cdac.in>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> /* Last packet in the request */
> -#define TXREQ_FLAGS_REQ_LAST_PKT (1 << 0)
> -#define TXREQ_FLAGS_IOVEC_LAST_PKT (1 << 0)
> +#define TXREQ_FLAGS_REQ_LAST_PKT BIT(1 << 0)
> +#define TXREQ_FLAGS_IOVEC_LAST_PKT BIT(1 << 0)
>
It is wrong. It actually creates 0x2 instead of 0x1.
> -#define SDMA_PKT_Q_INACTIVE (1 << 0)
> -#define SDMA_PKT_Q_ACTIVE (1 << 1)
> -#define SDMA_PKT_Q_DEFERRED (1 << 2)
> +#define SDMA_PKT_Q_INACTIVE BIT(1 << 0)
> +#define SDMA_PKT_Q_ACTIVE BIT(1 << 1)
> +#define SDMA_PKT_Q_DEFERRED BIT(1 << 2)
The same comment as above. It is wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 11:58 [PATCH 1/1] staging: rdma: hfi1 : Prefer using the BIT macro Sunny Kumar
2015-11-05 13:27 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2015-11-05 14:24 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2015-11-05 17:06 ` ira.weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151105132733.GD4023@leon.nu \
--to=leon@leon.nu \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=infinipath@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
--cc=sunny.kumar.roy@gmail.com \
--cc=sunnyk@cdac.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).