From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mad: In validate_mad, validate CM method and attribute Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:13:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20151112221300.GA12250@obsidianresearch.com> References: <56447CA2.1070802@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20151112181339.GA16488@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A9BACD7D@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A9BACD7D-8oqHQFITsIHTXloPLtfHfbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "Weiny, Ira" , Hal Rosenstock , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Sagi Grimberg , Bart Van Assche List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:55PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > > + /* CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo only use Send method > > */ > > > + if (mad_hdr->mgmt_class == IB_MGMT_CLASS_CM) { > > > + if (mad_hdr->attr_id != IB_MGMT_CLASSPORTINFO_ATTR_ID) { > > > + if (mad_hdr->method != IB_MGMT_METHOD_SEND) > > > + goto out; > > > + } else if (mad_hdr->method != IB_MGMT_METHOD_GET_RESP) > > > + goto out; > > > + } > > > > Doesn't this invalidate a CM Get(ClassPortInfo) mad? > > I believe this does. I think you could remove the else if clause > and let the received MAD get passed to the CM. It would be dropped > there as unsupported. The net result is likely the same. IIRC responding to Get(CPI) is mandatory? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html