From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] IB: only keep a single key in struct ib_mr Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:48:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20151123194833.GC17760@lst.de> References: <1448214409-7729-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1448214409-7729-11-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20151123194124.GF32085@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151123194124.GF32085-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:41:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I like this too, but, I'm a little worried this makes the API more > confusing - ideally, we'd get rid of all the IB_ACCESS stuff from > within the kernel completely. That's my plan - at least for MRs. The only place still using it are ib_get_dma_mr and FRM. Both of them should be switche=D1=95 to this new API - ib_get_dma_mr is trivial and will follow next, while for =46MRs I was going to look to change the code to mirror what Sagi did to FRs. That is if we can't get rid of FMRs entirely soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html