From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Dalessandro Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/37] IB/rdmavt: Add protection domain to rdmavt. Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:45:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20151210164502.GC13412@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> References: <20151207204046.8144.18752.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <20151207204309.8144.26707.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <20151208062816.GE7313@leon.nu> <20151208072027.GF7313@leon.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151208072027.GF7313-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mike Marciniszyn , Ira Weiny List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:27AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:28:17AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:43:10PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >> > + >> > +/* >> > + * Things that are driver specific, module parameters in hfi1 and qib >> > + */ >> > +struct rvt_driver_params { >> > + int max_pds; >> Can it be negative value? >> > +}; >Forget my question, I see, you removed this variable in the following patch. Well removed it from the rvt structure, but the concept still exists. I'm now using struct ib_device_attr.max_pd. -Denny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html