[PATCH v2 0/5] Clean up SDMA engine code

[PATCH v2 0/5] Clean up SDMA engine code

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Various improvements to the SDMA engine code.

---
Changes from V1:
	Fix off by one error in the last patch

Mitko Haralanov (5):
  staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
  staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
  staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
  staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
  staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests

 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c   |  11 +-
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h        |   4 +-
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c |  97 +++-------
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c  | 319 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h  |   2 +
 5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/5] staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Convert hfi1_get_user_pages() to use get_user_pages_fast(),
which is much fatster. The mm semaphore is still taken to
update the pinned page count but is for a much shorter
amount of time.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c   |  8 +--
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h        |  4 +-
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c | 97 +++++++++-------------------------
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
index 22037ce984c8..76580030f514 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
@@ -1670,8 +1670,8 @@ static int exp_tid_setup(struct file *fp, struct hfi1_tid_info *tinfo)
 		 * Now that we know how many free RcvArray entries we have,
 		 * we can pin that many user pages.
 		 */
-		ret = hfi1_get_user_pages(vaddr + (mapped * PAGE_SIZE),
-					  pinned, pages);
+		ret = hfi1_acquire_user_pages(vaddr + (mapped * PAGE_SIZE),
+					      pinned, true, pages);
 		if (ret) {
 			/*
 			 * We can't continue because the pages array won't be
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ static int exp_tid_free(struct file *fp, struct hfi1_tid_info *tinfo)
 				}
 			}
 			flush_wc();
-			hfi1_release_user_pages(pshadow, pcount);
+			hfi1_release_user_pages(pshadow, pcount, true);
 			clear_bit(bitidx, &uctxt->tidusemap[idx]);
 			map &= ~(1ULL<<bitidx);
 		}
@@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ static void unlock_exp_tids(struct hfi1_ctxtdata *uctxt)
 		uctxt->physshadow[tid] = 0;
 		uctxt->tid_pg_list[tid] = NULL;
 		pci_unmap_page(dd->pcidev, phys, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
-		hfi1_release_user_pages(&p, 1);
+		hfi1_release_user_pages(&p, 1, true);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h
index 54ed6b36c1a7..467e1a9f8ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h
@@ -1551,8 +1551,8 @@ void hfi1_set_led_override(struct hfi1_pportdata *ppd, unsigned int val);
  */
 #define DEFAULT_RCVHDR_ENTSIZE 32
 
-int hfi1_get_user_pages(unsigned long, size_t, struct page **);
-void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct page **, size_t);
+int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(unsigned long, size_t, bool, struct page **);
+void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct page **, size_t, bool);
 
 static inline void clear_rcvhdrtail(const struct hfi1_ctxtdata *rcd)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c
index 9071afbd7bf4..692de658f0dc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c
@@ -49,59 +49,11 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 
 #include "hfi.h"
 
-static void __hfi1_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages,
-				      int dirty)
-{
-	size_t i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
-		if (dirty)
-			set_page_dirty_lock(p[i]);
-		put_page(p[i]);
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * Call with current->mm->mmap_sem held.
- */
-static int __hfi1_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
-				 struct page **p)
-{
-	unsigned long lock_limit;
-	size_t got;
-	int ret;
-
-	lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
-	if (num_pages > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto bail;
-	}
-
-	for (got = 0; got < num_pages; got += ret) {
-		ret = get_user_pages(current, current->mm,
-				     start_page + got * PAGE_SIZE,
-				     num_pages - got, 1, 1,
-				     p + got, NULL);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto bail_release;
-	}
-
-	current->mm->pinned_vm += num_pages;
-
-	ret = 0;
-	goto bail;
-
-bail_release:
-	__hfi1_release_user_pages(p, got, 0);
-bail:
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /**
  * hfi1_map_page - a safety wrapper around pci_map_page()
  *
@@ -116,41 +68,44 @@ dma_addr_t hfi1_map_page(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct page *page,
 	return phys;
 }
 
-/**
- * hfi1_get_user_pages - lock user pages into memory
- * @start_page: the start page
- * @num_pages: the number of pages
- * @p: the output page structures
- *
- * This function takes a given start page (page aligned user virtual
- * address) and pins it and the following specified number of pages.  For
- * now, num_pages is always 1, but that will probably change at some point
- * (because caller is doing expected sends on a single virtually contiguous
- * buffer, so we can do all pages at once).
- */
-int hfi1_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
-			struct page **p)
+int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(unsigned long vaddr, size_t npages, bool writable,
+			    struct page **pages)
 {
+	unsigned long pinned, lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	bool can_lock = capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK);
 	int ret;
 
-	down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	pinned = current->mm->pinned_vm;
+	up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 
-	ret = __hfi1_get_user_pages(start_page, num_pages, p);
+	if (pinned + npages > lock_limit && !can_lock)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ret = get_user_pages_fast(vaddr, npages, writable, pages);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	current->mm->pinned_vm += ret;
 	up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages)
+void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t npages, bool dirty)
 {
-	if (current->mm) /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
-		down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	size_t i;
 
-	__hfi1_release_user_pages(p, num_pages, 1);
+	for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
+		if (dirty)
+			set_page_dirty_lock(p[i]);
+		put_page(p[i]);
+	}
 
-	if (current->mm) {
-		current->mm->pinned_vm -= num_pages;
+	if (current->mm) { /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
+		down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+		current->mm->pinned_vm -= npages;
 		up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 	}
 }
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 2/5] staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

There is no need to cleck if the packet queue is allocated
when cleaning up a user context. The hfi1_user_sdma_free_queues()
function already does all the required checks.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
index 76580030f514..fd90fb658b5b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c
@@ -737,8 +737,7 @@ static int hfi1_file_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *fp)
 
 	flush_wc();
 	/* drain user sdma queue */
-	if (fdata->pq)
-		hfi1_user_sdma_free_queues(fdata);
+	hfi1_user_sdma_free_queues(fdata);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear any left over, unhandled events so the next process that
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 3/5] staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Clean-up unnecessary goto statements based on feedback from the
mailing list on previous patch submissions.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c | 37 +++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
index 41408f82afe8..060c2200757d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
@@ -505,15 +505,13 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 		   "[%u:%u:%u] First vector not big enough for header %lu/%lu",
 		   dd->unit, uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt,
 		   iovec[idx].iov_len, sizeof(info) + sizeof(req->hdr));
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto done;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	ret = copy_from_user(&info, iovec[idx].iov_base, sizeof(info));
 	if (ret) {
 		hfi1_cdbg(SDMA, "[%u:%u:%u] Failed to copy info QW (%d)",
 			  dd->unit, uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt, ret);
-		ret = -EFAULT;
-		goto done;
+		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 	trace_hfi1_sdma_user_reqinfo(dd, uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt,
 				     (u16 *)&info);
@@ -521,15 +519,13 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 		hfi1_cdbg(SDMA, "[%u:%u:%u] Entry %u is in QUEUED state",
 			  dd->unit, uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt,
 			  info.comp_idx);
-		ret = -EBADSLT;
-		goto done;
+		return -EBADSLT;
 	}
 	if (!info.fragsize) {
 		hfi1_cdbg(SDMA,
 			  "[%u:%u:%u:%u] Request does not specify fragsize",
 			  dd->unit, uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt, info.comp_idx);
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto done;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	/*
 	 * We've done all the safety checks that we can up to this point,
@@ -554,8 +550,7 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 	if (!info.npkts || req->data_iovs > MAX_VECTORS_PER_REQ) {
 		SDMA_DBG(req, "Too many vectors (%u/%u)", req->data_iovs,
 			 MAX_VECTORS_PER_REQ);
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto done;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	/* Copy the header from the user buffer */
 	ret = copy_from_user(&req->hdr, iovec[idx].iov_base + sizeof(info),
@@ -782,10 +777,8 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 	struct hfi1_user_sdma_pkt_q *pq = NULL;
 	struct user_sdma_iovec *iovec = NULL;
 
-	if (!req->pq) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto done;
-	}
+	if (!req->pq)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	pq = req->pq;
 
@@ -795,7 +788,7 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 	if (unlikely(req->seqnum == req->info.npkts)) {
 		if (!list_empty(&req->txps))
 			goto dosend;
-		goto done;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	if (!maxpkts || maxpkts > req->info.npkts - req->seqnum)
@@ -812,15 +805,13 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 		 */
 		if (test_bit(SDMA_REQ_HAS_ERROR, &req->flags)) {
 			set_bit(SDMA_REQ_DONE_ERROR, &req->flags);
-			ret = -EFAULT;
-			goto done;
+			return -EFAULT;
 		}
 
 		tx = kmem_cache_alloc(pq->txreq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!tx) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto done;
-		}
+		if (!tx)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
 		tx->flags = 0;
 		tx->req = req;
 		tx->busycount = 0;
@@ -1021,12 +1012,12 @@ dosend:
 			if (test_bit(SDMA_REQ_HAVE_AHG, &req->flags))
 				sdma_ahg_free(req->sde, req->ahg_idx);
 		}
-	goto done;
+	return ret;
+
 free_txreq:
 	sdma_txclean(pq->dd, &tx->txreq);
 free_tx:
 	kmem_cache_free(pq->txreq_cache, tx);
-done:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 4/5] staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

It is possible for an SDMA transmission error to happen
during the processing of an user SDMA transfer. In that
case it is better to detect it early and abort any further
attempts to send more packets.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
index 060c2200757d..3033df5596f3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
@@ -782,6 +782,12 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 
 	pq = req->pq;
 
+	/* If tx completion has reported an error, we are done. */
+	if (test_bit(SDMA_REQ_HAS_ERROR, &req->flags)) {
+		set_bit(SDMA_REQ_DONE_ERROR, &req->flags);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Check if we might have sent the entire request already
 	 */
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 5/5] staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests

[ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w]

From: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

The driver pins pages on behalf of user processes in two
separate instances - when the process has submitted a
SDMA transfer and when the process programs an expected
receive buffer.

When pinning pages, the driver is required to observe the
locked page limit set by the system administrator and refuse
to lock more pages than allowed. Such a check was done for
expected receives but was missing from the SDMA transfer
code path.

This commit adds the missing check for SDMA transfers. As of
this commit, user SDMA or expected receive requests will be
rejected if the number of pages required to be pinned will
exceed the set limit.

Due to the fact that the driver needs to take the MM semaphore
in order to update the locked page count (which can sleep), this
cannot be done by the callback function as it [the callback] is
executed in interrupt context. Therefore, it is necessary to put
all the completed SDMA tx requests onto a separate list (txcmp) and
offload the actual clean-up and unpinning work to a workqueue.

Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

---
Changes from V1:
	Fix off by 1 error

 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c | 276 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h |   2 +
 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
index 3033df5596f3..d3de771a0770 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c
@@ -214,12 +214,6 @@ struct user_sdma_request {
 	 */
 	u8 omfactor;
 	/*
-	 * pointer to the user's task_struct. We are going to
-	 * get a reference to it so we can process io vectors
-	 * at a later time.
-	 */
-	struct task_struct *user_proc;
-	/*
 	 * pointer to the user's mm_struct. We are going to
 	 * get a reference to it so it doesn't get freed
 	 * since we might not be in process context when we
@@ -245,9 +239,13 @@ struct user_sdma_request {
 	u16 tididx;
 	u32 sent;
 	u64 seqnum;
-	spinlock_t list_lock;
 	struct list_head txps;
+	spinlock_t txcmp_lock;  /* protect txcmp list */
+	struct list_head txcmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	/* status of the last txreq completed */
+	int status;
+	struct work_struct worker;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -260,6 +258,7 @@ struct user_sdma_txreq {
 	/* Packet header for the txreq */
 	struct hfi1_pkt_header hdr;
 	struct sdma_txreq txreq;
+	struct list_head list;
 	struct user_sdma_request *req;
 	struct {
 		struct user_sdma_iovec *vec;
@@ -282,10 +281,12 @@ struct user_sdma_txreq {
 static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *, unsigned);
 static int num_user_pages(const struct iovec *);
 static void user_sdma_txreq_cb(struct sdma_txreq *, int, int);
+static void user_sdma_delayed_completion(struct work_struct *);
 static void user_sdma_free_request(struct user_sdma_request *);
 static int pin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_request *,
 			    struct user_sdma_iovec *);
-static void unpin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_iovec *);
+static void unpin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_request *,
+			       struct user_sdma_iovec *);
 static int check_header_template(struct user_sdma_request *,
 				 struct hfi1_pkt_header *, u32, u32);
 static int set_txreq_header(struct user_sdma_request *,
@@ -391,6 +392,7 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues(struct hfi1_ctxtdata *uctxt, struct file *fp)
 	pq->n_max_reqs = hfi1_sdma_comp_ring_size;
 	pq->state = SDMA_PKT_Q_INACTIVE;
 	atomic_set(&pq->n_reqs, 0);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&pq->wait);
 
 	iowait_init(&pq->busy, 0, NULL, defer_packet_queue,
 		    activate_packet_queue);
@@ -451,26 +453,16 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_free_queues(struct hfi1_filedata *fd)
 		  uctxt->ctxt, fd->subctxt);
 	pq = fd->pq;
 	if (pq) {
-		u16 i, j;
-
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&uctxt->sdma_qlock, flags);
 		if (!list_empty(&pq->list))
 			list_del_init(&pq->list);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uctxt->sdma_qlock, flags);
 		iowait_sdma_drain(&pq->busy);
-		if (pq->reqs) {
-			for (i = 0, j = 0; i < atomic_read(&pq->n_reqs) &&
-				     j < pq->n_max_reqs; j++) {
-				struct user_sdma_request *req = &pq->reqs[j];
-
-				if (test_bit(SDMA_REQ_IN_USE, &req->flags)) {
-					set_comp_state(req, ERROR, -ECOMM);
-					user_sdma_free_request(req);
-					i++;
-				}
-			}
-			kfree(pq->reqs);
-		}
+		/* Wait until all requests have been freed. */
+		wait_event_interruptible(
+			pq->wait,
+			(ACCESS_ONCE(pq->state) == SDMA_PKT_Q_INACTIVE));
+		kfree(pq->reqs);
 		kmem_cache_destroy(pq->txreq_cache);
 		kfree(pq);
 		fd->pq = NULL;
@@ -540,8 +532,12 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 	req->data_iovs = req_iovcnt(info.ctrl) - 1;
 	req->pq = pq;
 	req->cq = cq;
+	req->status = -1;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->txps);
-	spin_lock_init(&req->list_lock);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->txcmp);
+	INIT_WORK(&req->worker, user_sdma_delayed_completion);
+
+	spin_lock_init(&req->txcmp_lock);
 	memcpy(&req->info, &info, sizeof(info));
 
 	if (req_opcode(info.ctrl) == EXPECTED)
@@ -680,18 +676,16 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 	sent = user_sdma_send_pkts(req, pcount);
 	if (unlikely(sent < 0)) {
 		if (sent != -EBUSY) {
-			ret = sent;
-			goto send_err;
+			req->status = sent;
+			set_comp_state(req, ERROR, req->status);
+			return sent;
 		} else
 			sent = 0;
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&pq->n_reqs);
+	xchg(&pq->state, SDMA_PKT_Q_ACTIVE);
 
 	if (sent < req->info.npkts) {
-		/* Take the references to the user's task and mm_struct */
-		get_task_struct(current);
-		req->user_proc = current;
-
 		/*
 		 * This is a somewhat blocking send implementation.
 		 * The driver will block the caller until all packets of the
@@ -701,8 +695,10 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 		while (!test_bit(SDMA_REQ_SEND_DONE, &req->flags)) {
 			ret = user_sdma_send_pkts(req, pcount);
 			if (ret < 0) {
-				if (ret != -EBUSY)
-					goto send_err;
+				if (ret != -EBUSY) {
+					req->status = ret;
+					return ret;
+				}
 				wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
 					pq->busy.wait_dma,
 					(pq->state == SDMA_PKT_Q_ACTIVE),
@@ -712,14 +708,10 @@ int hfi1_user_sdma_process_request(struct file *fp, struct iovec *iovec,
 		}
 
 	}
-	ret = 0;
 	*count += idx;
-	goto done;
-send_err:
-	set_comp_state(req, ERROR, ret);
+	return 0;
 free_req:
 	user_sdma_free_request(req);
-done:
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -822,6 +814,7 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 		tx->req = req;
 		tx->busycount = 0;
 		tx->idx = -1;
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tx->list);
 		memset(tx->iovecs, 0, sizeof(tx->iovecs));
 
 		if (req->seqnum == req->info.npkts - 1)
@@ -946,9 +939,8 @@ static int user_sdma_send_pkts(struct user_sdma_request *req, unsigned maxpkts)
 			if (ret) {
 				int i;
 
-				dd_dev_err(pq->dd,
-					   "SDMA txreq add page failed %d\n",
-					   ret);
+				SDMA_DBG(req, "SDMA txreq add page failed %d\n",
+					 ret);
 				/* Mark all assigned vectors as complete so they
 				 * are unpinned in the callback. */
 				for (i = tx->idx; i >= 0; i--) {
@@ -1042,52 +1034,58 @@ static inline int num_user_pages(const struct iovec *iov)
 
 static int pin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_request *req,
 			    struct user_sdma_iovec *iovec) {
-	int ret = 0;
-	unsigned pinned;
+	int pinned, npages;
 
-	iovec->npages = num_user_pages(&iovec->iov);
-	iovec->pages = kcalloc(iovec->npages, sizeof(*iovec->pages),
-			       GFP_KERNEL);
+	npages = num_user_pages(&iovec->iov);
+	iovec->pages = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*iovec->pages), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!iovec->pages) {
 		SDMA_DBG(req, "Failed page array alloc");
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto done;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	/* If called by the kernel thread, use the user's mm */
-	if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
-		use_mm(req->user_proc->mm);
-	pinned = get_user_pages_fast(
-		(unsigned long)iovec->iov.iov_base,
-		iovec->npages, 0, iovec->pages);
-	/* If called by the kernel thread, unuse the user's mm */
-	if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
-		unuse_mm(req->user_proc->mm);
-	if (pinned != iovec->npages) {
-		SDMA_DBG(req, "Failed to pin pages (%u/%u)", pinned,
-			 iovec->npages);
-		ret = -EFAULT;
-		goto pfree;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get a reference to the process's mm so we can use it when
+	 * unpinning the io vectors.
+	 */
+	req->pq->user_mm = get_task_mm(current);
+
+	pinned = hfi1_acquire_user_pages((unsigned long)iovec->iov.iov_base,
+					 npages, 0, iovec->pages);
+
+	if (pinned < 0)
+		return pinned;
+
+	iovec->npages = pinned;
+	if (pinned != npages) {
+		SDMA_DBG(req, "Failed to pin pages (%d/%u)", pinned, npages);
+		unpin_vector_pages(req, iovec);
+		return -EFAULT;
 	}
-	goto done;
-pfree:
-	unpin_vector_pages(iovec);
-done:
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static void unpin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_iovec *iovec)
+static void unpin_vector_pages(struct user_sdma_request *req,
+			       struct user_sdma_iovec *iovec)
 {
-	unsigned i;
+	/*
+	 * Unpinning is done through the workqueue so use the
+	 * process's mm if we have a reference to it.
+	 */
+	if ((current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && req->pq->user_mm)
+		use_mm(req->pq->user_mm);
 
-	if (ACCESS_ONCE(iovec->offset) != iovec->iov.iov_len) {
-		hfi1_cdbg(SDMA,
-			  "the complete vector has not been sent yet %llu %zu",
-			  iovec->offset, iovec->iov.iov_len);
-		return;
+	hfi1_release_user_pages(iovec->pages, iovec->npages, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Unuse the user's mm (see above) and release the
+	 * reference to it.
+	 */
+	if (req->pq->user_mm) {
+		if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
+			unuse_mm(req->pq->user_mm);
+		mmput(req->pq->user_mm);
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < iovec->npages; i++)
-		if (iovec->pages[i])
-			put_page(iovec->pages[i]);
+
 	kfree(iovec->pages);
 	iovec->pages = NULL;
 	iovec->npages = 0;
@@ -1355,54 +1353,116 @@ static int set_txreq_header_ahg(struct user_sdma_request *req,
 	return diff;
 }
 
+/*
+ * SDMA tx request completion callback. Called when the SDMA progress
+ * state machine gets notification that the SDMA descriptors for this
+ * tx request have been processed by the DMA engine. Called in
+ * interrupt context.
+ */
 static void user_sdma_txreq_cb(struct sdma_txreq *txreq, int status,
 			       int drain)
 {
 	struct user_sdma_txreq *tx =
 		container_of(txreq, struct user_sdma_txreq, txreq);
-	struct user_sdma_request *req = tx->req;
-	struct hfi1_user_sdma_pkt_q *pq = req ? req->pq : NULL;
-	u64 tx_seqnum;
+	struct user_sdma_request *req;
+	bool defer;
+	int i;
 
-	if (unlikely(!req || !pq))
+	if (!tx->req)
 		return;
 
-	/* If we have any io vectors associated with this txreq,
-	 * check whether they need to be 'freed'. */
-	if (tx->idx != -1) {
-		int i;
+	req = tx->req;
+	/*
+	 * If this is the callback for the last packet of the request,
+	 * queue up the request for clean up.
+	 */
+	defer = (tx->seqnum == req->info.npkts - 1);
 
-		for (i = tx->idx; i >= 0; i--) {
-			if (tx->iovecs[i].flags & TXREQ_FLAGS_IOVEC_LAST_PKT)
-				unpin_vector_pages(tx->iovecs[i].vec);
+	/*
+	 * If we have any io vectors associated with this txreq,
+	 * check whether they need to be 'freed'. We can't free them
+	 * here because the unpin function needs to be able to sleep.
+	 */
+	for (i = tx->idx; i >= 0; i--) {
+		if (tx->iovecs[i].flags & TXREQ_FLAGS_IOVEC_LAST_PKT) {
+			defer = true;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
 
-	tx_seqnum = tx->seqnum;
-	kmem_cache_free(pq->txreq_cache, tx);
-
+	req->status = status;
 	if (status != SDMA_TXREQ_S_OK) {
-		dd_dev_err(pq->dd, "SDMA completion with error %d", status);
-		set_comp_state(req, ERROR, status);
+		SDMA_DBG(req, "SDMA completion with error %d",
+			 status);
 		set_bit(SDMA_REQ_HAS_ERROR, &req->flags);
-		/* Do not free the request until the sender loop has ack'ed
-		 * the error and we've seen all txreqs. */
-		if (tx_seqnum == ACCESS_ONCE(req->seqnum) &&
-		    test_bit(SDMA_REQ_DONE_ERROR, &req->flags)) {
-			atomic_dec(&pq->n_reqs);
-			user_sdma_free_request(req);
-		}
+		defer = true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Defer the clean up of the iovectors and the request until later
+	 * so it can be done outside of interrupt context.
+	 */
+	if (defer) {
+		spin_lock(&req->txcmp_lock);
+		list_add_tail(&tx->list, &req->txcmp);
+		spin_unlock(&req->txcmp_lock);
+		schedule_work(&req->worker);
 	} else {
-		if (tx_seqnum == req->info.npkts - 1) {
-			/* We've sent and completed all packets in this
-			 * request. Signal completion to the user */
-			atomic_dec(&pq->n_reqs);
-			set_comp_state(req, COMPLETE, 0);
-			user_sdma_free_request(req);
+		kmem_cache_free(req->pq->txreq_cache, tx);
+	}
+}
+
+static void user_sdma_delayed_completion(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct user_sdma_request *req =
+		container_of(work, struct user_sdma_request, worker);
+	struct hfi1_user_sdma_pkt_q *pq = req->pq;
+	struct user_sdma_txreq *tx = NULL;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u64 seqnum;
+	int i;
+
+	while (1) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&req->txcmp_lock, flags);
+		if (!list_empty(&req->txcmp)) {
+			tx = list_first_entry(&req->txcmp,
+					      struct user_sdma_txreq, list);
+			list_del(&tx->list);
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&req->txcmp_lock, flags);
+		if (!tx)
+			break;
+
+		for (i = tx->idx; i >= 0; i--)
+			if (tx->iovecs[i].flags & TXREQ_FLAGS_IOVEC_LAST_PKT)
+				unpin_vector_pages(req, tx->iovecs[i].vec);
+
+		seqnum = tx->seqnum;
+		kmem_cache_free(pq->txreq_cache, tx);
+		tx = NULL;
+
+		if (req->status != SDMA_TXREQ_S_OK) {
+			if (seqnum == ACCESS_ONCE(req->seqnum) &&
+			    test_bit(SDMA_REQ_DONE_ERROR, &req->flags)) {
+				atomic_dec(&pq->n_reqs);
+				set_comp_state(req, ERROR, req->status);
+				user_sdma_free_request(req);
+				break;
+			}
+		} else {
+			if (seqnum == req->info.npkts - 1) {
+				atomic_dec(&pq->n_reqs);
+				set_comp_state(req, COMPLETE, 0);
+				user_sdma_free_request(req);
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 	}
-	if (!atomic_read(&pq->n_reqs))
+
+	if (!atomic_read(&pq->n_reqs)) {
 		xchg(&pq->state, SDMA_PKT_Q_INACTIVE);
+		wake_up(&pq->wait);
+	}
 }
 
 static void user_sdma_free_request(struct user_sdma_request *req)
@@ -1423,10 +1483,8 @@ static void user_sdma_free_request(struct user_sdma_request *req)
 
 		for (i = 0; i < req->data_iovs; i++)
 			if (req->iovs[i].npages && req->iovs[i].pages)
-				unpin_vector_pages(&req->iovs[i]);
+				unpin_vector_pages(req, &req->iovs[i]);
 	}
-	if (req->user_proc)
-		put_task_struct(req->user_proc);
 	kfree(req->tids);
 	clear_bit(SDMA_REQ_IN_USE, &req->flags);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h
index 0046ffa774fe..0afa28508a8a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct hfi1_user_sdma_pkt_q {
 	struct user_sdma_request *reqs;
 	struct iowait busy;
 	unsigned state;
+	wait_queue_head_t wait;
+	struct mm_struct *user_mm;
 };
 
 struct hfi1_user_sdma_comp_q {
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Clean up SDMA engine code

[ira.weiny]

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:10:08PM -0500, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> Various improvements to the SDMA engine code.

Greg,

Thanks for reviewing and accepting our patches to staging-testing.  I apologize
for the conflicts we had between the 3 of us submitting.  However, in
attempting to rework an internal branch to ensure this does not happen again I
believe there were more conflicts than their should have been due to patches
being accepted out of order.

For example, I found the following error in your staging tree below.

This series you applied in the following order which causes a build failure on
the middle commit -- a0d4069.

483119a staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
def8228 staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
a0d4069 staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
faa98b8 staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
6a5464f staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early

The order as submitted was:

staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests



Do I need to resolve this somehow?  Or is this something you resolve while the
patches are in staging-testing?

Is there something we need to do in the cover letter of a patch series to
ensure order?  Perhaps my cover letter implied these were not ordered?  If so,
I again apologize.

Thanks,
Ira

> 
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> 	Fix off by one error in the last patch
> 
> Mitko Haralanov (5):
>   staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
>   staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
>   staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
>   staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
>   staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
> 
>  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/file_ops.c   |  11 +-
>  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/hfi.h        |   4 +-
>  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c |  97 +++-------
>  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c  | 319 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.h  |   2 +
>  5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Clean up SDMA engine code

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:48:03PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:10:08PM -0500, ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Various improvements to the SDMA engine code.
> 
> Greg,
> 
> Thanks for reviewing and accepting our patches to staging-testing.  I apologize
> for the conflicts we had between the 3 of us submitting.  However, in
> attempting to rework an internal branch to ensure this does not happen again I
> believe there were more conflicts than their should have been due to patches
> being accepted out of order.
> 
> For example, I found the following error in your staging tree below.
> 
> This series you applied in the following order which causes a build failure on
> the middle commit -- a0d4069.
> 
> 483119a staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
> def8228 staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
> a0d4069 staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
> faa98b8 staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
> 6a5464f staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
> 
> The order as submitted was:
> 
> staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
> staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
> staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
> staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
> staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
> 
> 
> 
> Do I need to resolve this somehow?  Or is this something you resolve while the
> patches are in staging-testing?
> 
> Is there something we need to do in the cover letter of a patch series to
> ensure order?  Perhaps my cover letter implied these were not ordered?  If so,
> I again apologize.

Did you number your patches?  That's the only way to ensure that they
are applied in the correct order, that's what I sort on to apply them.
If you don't order them, I randomly guess, or just reject them...

All seems to build now, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Clean up SDMA engine code

[ira.weiny]

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:13:49PM -0800, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:48:03PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:10:08PM -0500, ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > 
> > > Various improvements to the SDMA engine code.
> > 
> > Greg,
> > 
> > Thanks for reviewing and accepting our patches to staging-testing.  I apologize
> > for the conflicts we had between the 3 of us submitting.  However, in
> > attempting to rework an internal branch to ensure this does not happen again I
> > believe there were more conflicts than their should have been due to patches
> > being accepted out of order.
> > 
> > For example, I found the following error in your staging tree below.
> > 
> > This series you applied in the following order which causes a build failure on
> > the middle commit -- a0d4069.
> > 
> > 483119a staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
> > def8228 staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
> > a0d4069 staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
> > faa98b8 staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
> > 6a5464f staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
> > 
> > The order as submitted was:
> > 
> > staging/rdma/hfi1: Convert to use get_user_pages_fast
> > staging/rdma/hfi1: Unconditionally clean-up SDMA queues
> > staging/rdma/hfi1: Clean-up unnecessary goto statements
> > staging/rdma/hfi1: Detect SDMA transmission error early
> > staging/rdma/hfi1: Add page lock limit check for SDMA requests
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Do I need to resolve this somehow?  Or is this something you resolve while the
> > patches are in staging-testing?
> > 
> > Is there something we need to do in the cover letter of a patch series to
> > ensure order?  Perhaps my cover letter implied these were not ordered?  If so,
> > I again apologize.
> 
> Did you number your patches?

Yes, sent with git-send-email.

http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2015-December/thread.html#82509

> That's the only way to ensure that they
> are applied in the correct order, that's what I sort on to apply them.
> If you don't order them, I randomly guess, or just reject them...
> 
> All seems to build now, right?

Yes all builds now.  I just did not know if as part of testing an incremental
build check would then reject the patch.

Ira

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html