From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:06:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20160405090627.GA26425@infradead.org> References: <1458850962-16057-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1458850962-16057-2-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <20160404193640.GA7822@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160405012504.GG24661@htj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160405012504.GG24661@htj.duckdns.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Parav Pandit , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:25:04PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Is it actually customary to have rdma core module updated more > frequently separate from the kernel? Out-of-tree modules being > updated separately happens quite a bit but this is an in-kernel > module, which usually is tightly coupled with the rest of the kernel. People do it for all the wrong reasons - OFED and organization of morons wants people to use their modules, which causes lots of harm. Anything that makes this harder is a good thing.