public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: sagig@mellanox.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: T10 PI offloading seems to be broken in iser/isert in 4.5/4.6-rc
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:58:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160409045846.GA9269@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460169374.5010.4.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 07:36:14PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Ah, yes.  However, TARGET_PROT_DIN_INSERT / TARGET_PROT_DOUT_STRIP
> will only be happening in sbc_set_prot_op_checks() if fabric_prot = true
> for a backend that does not support PI.
> 
> Eg: fabric_prot is for the special case where the fabric supports PI,
> but the backend does not, and the normal feature bits a device would
> expose for PI are emulated based upon the fabric protection features.
> 
> Since your backend does support PI, cmd->prot_op should always be
> TARGET_PROT_*_PASS regardless.
> 
> The other thing to check is that isert_get_sup_prot_ops() is returning
> TARGET_PROT_ALL when tpg->tpg_attrib.t10_pi = true.

Ok, it turns out this problem was a second LUN that doesn't support
PI.  So the reported bug is for a this fabrics_prot case, the scsi_debug
LUN was actually doing fine.

The root cause seems to be that transport_generic_new_cmd allocates
a prot_sg for all protection cases, which causes isert_reg_sig_mr
to assign a value to sig_wr.prot even for the strip/insert case,
which will then cause mlx5 to blow up.  But even when fixing that
I run into data compare errors, so there's defintively something deeper
hiding here.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-09  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-08 22:15 T10 PI offloading seems to be broken in iser/isert in 4.5/4.6-rc Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-08 23:48 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-09  0:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-09  2:36     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-09  4:58       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
     [not found]         ` <20160409045846.GA9269-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-10  8:53           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-04-10 14:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-10 15:30               ` Sagi Grimberg
     [not found]       ` <1460169374.5010.4.camel-XoQW25Eq2zviZyQQd+hFbcojREIfoBdhmpATvIKMPHk@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-10  8:42         ` sagig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160409045846.GA9269@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox