From: Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Erez Shitrit
<erezsh-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
lariel-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 for-next 1/4] IB/core: Introduce capabilitymask2 field in ClassPortInfo mad
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 14:53:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160507115339.GN29160@leon.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <904cc673-8208-8cb9-88fa-194db12f6332-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4697 bytes --]
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:32:30AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 8:28 AM, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Hal Rosenstock <hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> On 5/5/2016 7:36 AM, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> >>> Change struct ib_class_port_info to conform to IB Spec 1.3
> >>> That in order to get specific capability mask from ClassPortInfo mad.
> >>>
> >>> >From the IB Spec, ClassPortInfo section:
> >>> "CapabilityMask2 Bits 0-26: Additional class-specific capabilities...
> >>> RespTimeValue the rest 5 bits"
> >>>
> >>> The new struct now has one field for capabilitymask2 (previously was the
> >>> reserved field) and the resp_time field.
> >>>
> >>> And it fixes up qib use of the field repurposed to be used as capabilitymask2:
> >>> IB/qib: Change pma_get_classportinfo
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Erez Shitrit <erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c | 4 +++-
> >>> include/rdma/ib_mad.h | 2 +-
> >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c
> >>> index 0bd1837..c5f6248 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c
> >>> @@ -1158,6 +1158,7 @@ static int pma_get_classportinfo(struct ib_pma_mad *pmp,
> >>> struct ib_class_port_info *p =
> >>> (struct ib_class_port_info *)pmp->data;
> >>> struct qib_devdata *dd = dd_from_ibdev(ibdev);
> >>> + char *p_cap_mask2;
> >>>
> >>> memset(pmp->data, 0, sizeof(pmp->data));
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1172,7 +1173,8 @@ static int pma_get_classportinfo(struct ib_pma_mad *pmp,
> >>> * Set the most significant bit of CM2 to indicate support for
> >>> * congestion statistics
> >>> */
> >>> - p->reserved[0] = dd->psxmitwait_supported << 7;
> >>> + p_cap_mask2 = (char *)&p->capability_mask2;
> >>> + p_cap_mask2[0] = dd->psxmitwait_supported << 7;
> >>> /*
> >>> * Expected response time is 4.096 usec. * 2^18 == 1.073741824 sec.
> >>> */
> >>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_mad.h b/include/rdma/ib_mad.h
> >>> index 37dd534c..0761ab9 100644
> >>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_mad.h
> >>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_mad.h
> >>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ struct ib_class_port_info {
> >>> u8 base_version;
> >>> u8 class_version;
> >>> __be16 capability_mask;
> >>> - u8 reserved[3];
> >>> + __be32 capability_mask2;
> >>> u8 resp_time_value;
> >>
> >> This looks wrong to me as CapabilityMask2 is 27 bits and RespTimeValue
> >> is the remaining 5 bits in a 32 bit field in ClassPortInfo attribute.
> >>
> >> -- Hal
> >
> > Can you please elaborate more on that?
> > In V0 I kept both fields in the same field in the struct and you
> > suggested to keep them each by its own field, now we are going back
> > again ?
>
> It's the field widths that looks problematic to me. Everything starting
> with resp_time_value is moved down/off by a byte since capability mask2
> is 32 bits here followed by 8 bits of response time value rather than
> both of them fitting into 32 bits.
V0 patch which I reviewed had the following declaration (32 bits
were replaced by 32 bits field):
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ struct ib_class_port_info {
u8 base_version;
u8 class_version;
__be16 capability_mask;
- u8 reserved[3];
- u8 resp_time_value;
+ /* 27 bits for cap_mask2, 5 bits for resp_time */
+ __be32 cap_mask2_resp_time;
u8 redirect_gid[16];
__be32 redirect_tcslfl;
__be16 redirect_lid;
>
> >
> >>
> >>> u8 redirect_gid[16];
> >>> __be32 redirect_tcslfl;
> >>>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-07 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 11:36 [PATCH V2 for-next 0/4] Support SendOnlyFullMember join Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <1462448219-24571-1-git-send-email-erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-05 11:36 ` [PATCH V2 for-next 1/4] IB/core: Introduce capabilitymask2 field in ClassPortInfo mad Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <1462448219-24571-2-git-send-email-erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 2:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-05-06 12:14 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <0c160894-776d-2a28-5754-146abf82bb9d-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 12:28 ` Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <CAAk-MO-QuXT1Ko0JrE99V2eOGmhW=t7K57PaR=3CcUbPa1UepQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 12:32 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <904cc673-8208-8cb9-88fa-194db12f6332-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-07 11:53 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
[not found] ` <20160507115339.GN29160-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-07 12:01 ` Hal Rosenstock
2016-05-05 11:36 ` [PATCH V2 for-next 2/4] IB/SA Agent: Add support for SA agent get ClassPortInfo Erez Shitrit
2016-05-05 11:36 ` [PATCH V2 for-next 3/4] IB/core: Support new type of join-state for multicast Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <1462448219-24571-4-git-send-email-erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 2:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-05-05 11:36 ` [PATCH V2 for-next 4/4] IB/ipoib: Support SendOnlyFullMember MCG for SendOnly join Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <1462448219-24571-5-git-send-email-erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 2:29 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1605052124140.1091-wcBtFHqTun5QOdAKl3ChDw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-08 14:01 ` Erez Shitrit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160507115339.GN29160@leon.nu \
--to=leon-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=erezsh-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lariel-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox