From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 for-next 1/2] IB/core: Report LSO capabilities when querying device Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:26:55 +0300 Message-ID: <20160510192655.GC900@leon.nu> References: <20160506225523.GA21309@obsidianresearch.com> <20160509163537.GA15479@obsidianresearch.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB04A390@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20160509200507.GA23911@obsidianresearch.com> <20160510045801.GV29160@leon.nu> <20160510171819.GB2879@obsidianresearch.com> <20160510175200.GB900@leon.nu> <20160510181847.GA3754@obsidianresearch.com> Reply-To: leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S1BNGpv0yoYahz37" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160510181847.GA3754-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "Hefty, Sean" , Christoph Lameter , Matan Barak , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Majd Dibbiny , Bodong Wang List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:18:47PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:52:00PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:18:19AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:58:01AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > The Collab Summit discussions ended with a general consensus > > > > > that some things would go to the driver-specific channel, > > > > > while hardware behavior related to the common uAPI would go > > > > > through at least a multi-vendor sign off process - like IBTA. > > > >=20 > > > > We did ALL and much more from the discussed for RSS patches and > > > > at the end, we saw half a word from the maintainer about the > > > > future plans for its acceptance. > > >=20 > > > Where is the 'multi-vendor sign off' part of the process? > >=20 > > The steps are described at the following mail [1]. > >=20 > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-rdma&m=3D146218340000784&w=3D2 >=20 > None of that is what I mean when I say multi-vendor sign off. >=20 > I mean a vote showing multi-vendor participation, or active support > from other vendors. They participated in OFA/OFAWG/OFVWG and this ML and didn't said no. It is more than enough to be convinced. >=20 > Jason --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXMjX/AAoJEORje4g2clinhm4QALn6s7EU/dPthZffMTkIap4I 8npWzsipjzCaCBK4jNbH5AuimSoINXRnlSJZTwofVhmk95KlMTVPJhYMkgGF0FXw Gb1tyZpuH+ZPQmt5xd1pKDAn0LY0xLhoh+DKeLYYGlYaDbb+AGPm8SlEaQeiff2Q /JOGb3gEWW9f2vWUhvSrxPbXPz3s46q+OgCp4wusjKAMieaYC+egY5VQ3zq1UPOM 8O5ik+rWpDUObUNgt3O7MEYCsXUzUfcsOliswdb0xBYtUNcNcse8UC6hppMu7Amp 55x9luy6kp4Hf5j1HDpUNRPJyoDffaVaczcrngji9qf5sQctFgKnbPmiKS6k4rOe KZ2RT9UArU7DdFWwcDVEwLOevTplCRs1FH4HeoWNRkQYnrZxCUqO/Frjxv7wB2AP 3vQKeSMrh3csAkdQ7bNmusu7EZCuxT6e2G4VmweTAaKgRuDW2Ha7AKvjR2EfDh9X jGnjkKHic3AMInc2GbehpH+SVYVYQfTEBsByyTeAg7OtRDGyNa51hR7V7auVxeZn bHiY7cDdDE14vyEL+u0giyMsboHxpUuSQkwXBaT46SYoPkzS08a3Ml/XjU6Wh2wl lZN7yeaWxMxiLO1CRfDccOBeaW9P1XX5U9vPCS+m+nAhU7cBERQFS5CaUmMP4wni HIRYFU9rX/e3/VvC3rUf =Eq83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html