From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 for-next 1/2] IB/core: Report LSO capabilities when querying device Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:38:33 +0300 Message-ID: <20160510193833.GD900@leon.nu> References: <20160506225523.GA21309@obsidianresearch.com> <20160509163537.GA15479@obsidianresearch.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB04A390@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20160509200507.GA23911@obsidianresearch.com> <20160510045801.GV29160@leon.nu> <20160510171819.GB2879@obsidianresearch.com> <20160510175200.GB900@leon.nu> <20160510181847.GA3754@obsidianresearch.com> <20160510192655.GC900@leon.nu> Reply-To: leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160510192655.GC900-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "Hefty, Sean" , Christoph Lameter , Matan Barak , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Majd Dibbiny , Bodong Wang List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:26:55PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:18:47PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:52:00PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:18:19AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:58:01AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > The Collab Summit discussions ended with a general consensus > > > > > > that some things would go to the driver-specific channel, > > > > > > while hardware behavior related to the common uAPI would go > > > > > > through at least a multi-vendor sign off process - like IBTA. > > > > >=20 > > > > > We did ALL and much more from the discussed for RSS patches and > > > > > at the end, we saw half a word from the maintainer about the > > > > > future plans for its acceptance. > > > >=20 > > > > Where is the 'multi-vendor sign off' part of the process? > > >=20 > > > The steps are described at the following mail [1]. > > >=20 > > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-rdma&m=3D146218340000784&w=3D2 > >=20 > > None of that is what I mean when I say multi-vendor sign off. > >=20 > > I mean a vote showing multi-vendor participation, or active support > > from other vendors. >=20 > They participated in OFA/OFAWG/OFVWG and this ML and didn't said no. > It is more than enough to be convinced. Sorry for typos, s/didn't said/didn't say >=20 > >=20 > > Jason --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXMji5AAoJEORje4g2clinbgEQAJNrxkMmH3ybFyIDgaiQuof7 Wunabdc01gTvefNfycpwHFkWegUPL8TvHZkqv72h+7GS4/Sk8rRtWybtmg0apYR/ MYdCQaYw0XYIEmLnq1L+vlBQjg0yIQv8jGNuoPZaEUMjj+wYfbjShKCftdCgUsz/ h3hmKWD5I/+KpVdn0GhznBl52cFBb3XPQ0S281dpxADmsnP0jfoJA/QwYlNMgtyP khVbgxvUtw8Ryw/B1yMm4j7sEsTjXTPZ8WJGKDjUGmpQK0ZLiUrKGqkerH4E7Rlw TnDnCx7cgBt+jyrM4PqlfLKs/Lc6in86b/PZVaqrX8px9MRuKKmXDpWjvW3c5Mcu scGJtm5/qPnoZQRdg4Q3HhlhXTr0lPqtjz45846/v4Hs0ugQwy7lhOF6GfXHcJy7 V+LvwJs+6qhkWpYHqedAazCWHsg0NYJs5Ct/UsdiF9x/RluDpHOoD5SZTvERcTz5 Wkvg76khrNcBjSnxyGls2czIyF0cNM/QQKxmTYvge3kYc5vvb1buvA6rkT1M0hdN BE3IBwg6VQ3ocJ/Vn/mJvAlnxBIL5f3pPkEqdBQdm64jMzjMdxQoT1TyoQ/4as/t +FIAumHk5rpqJ1hsZgUXCeOAmO6AAwBwoJuKCMGTvJNScZDOCgtEh4OuLWJ2a8pi AC4Y4zufMJAvCciYONBp =CADj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html