From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address resolution module into core Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:27:43 -0600 Message-ID: <20160516182743.GF7248@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1462563928-29164-1-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <1462563928-29164-6-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <20160516163048.GB4662@leon.nu> <298657b0-6e57-745b-5eb3-001984bffbc3@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <298657b0-6e57-745b-5eb3-001984bffbc3-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Mark Bloch , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:42:34PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > Can you build netlink in and then init the ib_addr module after the > netlink init is complete? Wouldn't that resolve the dependency ordering > issue without changing the module names? Why are you so worried about ib_addr's module name? Is that actually hand loaded instead of relying in the implicit dependencies??? Is failure to load a module going to break any existing scripts? Worse comes to worse, just make dummy empty ib_addr.ko, but I've never seen that in-kernel before. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html