RE: [PATCH rdma-next 00/29] Soft RoCE driver

Hefty, Sean
2016-06-13T15:08:57Z

> To be clear, for what is was designed for, rdmavt is well designed.
> There was no criticism on this. All I was saying is that SoftRoCe has
> different needs

Ipath, qib, hfi1, and rxe all need to do a fully software implementation of IB transport. How could they possibly share any code?