Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/29] Soft RoCE driver

Leon Romanovsky
2016-06-08T13:10:28Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2278 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:20:55AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 6/8/2016 6:41 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:52:10AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >> Hey Moni & HCH, Co.
> >>
> >> (Adding Sagi CC')
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 11:49 +0300, Moni Shoua wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>> Do you have a changelog compred to the last version?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> - Moved from drivers/staging/rdma/rxe to drivers/infiniband/hw/rxe
> >>> - Rebase to newer kernel (was 4.4-rc6)
> >>> - Removed support in phys. MR
> >>> - Removed memory window codes (buggy)
> >>> - Mind IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> >>> - Dispatch IB event on port UP/DOWN
> >>> - Validate ICRC in receive
> >>> - Validate dgid in receive
> >>> - Scatter IPv4 header to right place for UD QP
> >>> - Other bug fixes
> >>> - Copyright dates were updated in file headers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> How well do FRWRs work, does this include Sagi's work in that area?
> >>> FRWR is not supported yet
> >>>> How well does posting of fenced WRs work?
> >>> We ran successfully some simple tests with IBV_SEND_FENCE
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great.
> >>
> >> A Soft-RoCE environment against v4.7-rc2 for iser and early nvme-fabrics
> >> code would be extremely useful. :-)
> >>
> >> Can we get this code into 0-day build ASAP..?
> >
> > Hi Nicholas,
> >
> > Per your request, I added Soft-RoCE code to my tree for testing (kbuild
> > and linux-next tests). Please be aware that official RDMA tree is Doug's
> > tree and only appearance in his tree will be sign for acceptance.
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=topic/rxe
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=testing/rdma-next
>
> I have a branch in my tree with this code in it already. This isn't a
> statement of inclusion, as I still have to finish the review, but it's
> on the rxe branch and I haven't seen any 0-day failure so far (it won't
> undergo linux-next until it officially hits my next branch).

Great,
We will see linux-next failures if any in my testing/rdma-next topic
(v4.7-rc2 + RXE).

>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]