From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
To: dledford@redhat.com, sean.hefty@intel.com,
hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, kgene@kernel.org,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com, dougthompson@xmission.com, bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ira.weiny@intel.com, sagi@grimberg.me, hch@infradead.org,
matanb@mellanox.com, markb@mellanox.com,
jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, dean.luick@intel.com,
chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:53:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802105328.30539-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> (raw)
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
index 2d49228..d78e96f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
static int mad_sendq_size = IB_MAD_QP_SEND_SIZE;
static int mad_recvq_size = IB_MAD_QP_RECV_SIZE;
-module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_queue_size, "Size of send queue in number of work requests");
-module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_queue_size, "Size of receive queue in number of work requests");
static struct list_head ib_mad_port_list;
--
2.9.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 10:53 Baole Ni [this message]
2016-08-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro ira.weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802105328.30539-1-baolex.ni@intel.com \
--to=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dean.luick@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markb@mellanox.com \
--cc=matanb@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox