Re: [PATCH rdma-next 6/6] RDMA/core: Unify style of IOCTL commands

[Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:45:21PM +0000, Dalessandro, Dennis wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 08:19 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I'm not opposed to trying to unify things, however this seems to be
> > > more than plop down the hfi1 stuff from here and put it over there.
> > > It
> > > is certainly not simplifying anything.
> > 
> > It is "dark side" of UAPI - inability to change legacy declarations.
> > This is why I didn't remove anything except _NUM() macro.
> > 
> > The simplification comes from definition of one place for
> > declaration of IOCTLs numbers and exporting it to users. It gives
> > visibility for user space authors too.
> 
> How often does a user need the IOCTL numbers for MAD and PSM and
> whatever else we come up with at the same time? Why would they care
> about the other IOCTL numbers? 

We will need new IOCTLs numbers for ABI and better if they be different
from already defined.

> 
> I don't really see a problem with keeping them separate, but I'm not
> really opposed to collapsing into one place either.

Thanks

> 
> -Denny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]