public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Shiraz Saleem
	<shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	e1000-rdma-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	Mustafa Ismail
	<mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] i40iw: Do not set self-referencing pointer to NULL after kfree
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:03:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160823210347.GP15065@leon.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66032524-b459-6429-93f9-101da7809f7e-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3970 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 03:05:42PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 8/23/2016 3:00 PM, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:46:23PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >>> On 8/23/2016 12:00 PM, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:41:35AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In i40iw_free_virt_mem(), do not set mem->va to NULL
> >>>>>> after freeing it as mem->va is a self-referencing pointer
> >>>>>> to mem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry, I failed to understand your commit message and your change.
> >>>>> What did you mean? How do you suppose to use mem->va pointer
> >>>>> after kfree() call on that pointer? Won't you have use-after-free bug in
> >>>>> such case?
> >>>>
> >>>> The pointer mem->va cannot be used after kfree. But setting it to 
> >>>> NULL would be writing to freed memory. In i40iw_puda_alloc_buf(), 
> >>>> when a buffer is allocated of type struct i40iw_puda_buf, the address 
> >>>> of the buffer itself is stored within the structure (in member buf_mem). 
> >>>> When this pointer is freed, the structure containing the pointer is freed,
> >>>> so writing to the structure would be writing to freed memory, which is 
> >>>> what this fix is for.
> >>>>  
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 4e9042e647ff ("i40iw: add hw and utils files")
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Reported-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> V2: Fix typo in subject line.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_utils.c | 1 -
> >>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_utils.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_utils.c
> >>>>>> index 0e8db0a..d5f5de2 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_utils.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_utils.c
> >>>>>> @@ -674,7 +674,6 @@ enum i40iw_status_code i40iw_free_virt_mem(struct i40iw_hw *hw,
> >>>>>>  	if (!mem)
> >>>>>>  		return I40IW_ERR_PARAM;
> >>>>>>  	kfree(mem->va);
> >>>>>> -	mem->va = NULL;
> >>>>>>  	return 0;
> >>>
> >>> Your commit message is a bit hard to follow, but if I follow the
> >>> conversation, kfree(mem->va) is the same as kfree(mem), is it not?  If
> >>> it is, couldn't you just kfree(mem)?  That would avoid the confusion
> >>> here.  Also, if it matters, you can use a temporary pointer, aka:
> >>>
> >>> p = mem->va;
> >>> mem->va = NULL;
> >>> kfree(p);
> >>>
> >>> but, again, if mem->va is just a self-referencing pointer back to mem,
> >>> then why not just kfree(mem)?  I'm concerned that this convoluted way of
> >>> doing things will come back to haunt us later when people think they are
> >>> submitting a fix and simply reintroduce the same bug again.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I totally agree with you.
> >>
> > 
> > OK, I see the the possible confusion of the commit message. 
> > 
> > Maybe the following is clearer:
> > "In i40iw_free_virt_mem(), do not set mem->va to NULL after freeing it, as mem->va is a pointer 
> > to the structure containing mem"
> > 
> > So kfree(mem->va) is not the same as kfree(mem). 
> 
> That makes more sense.  I still think things are a bit convoluted here,
> and maybe even a code comment is in order.  I'll probably change it up a
> little bit as I pull it in.

I would like to see code snippet of such struct and/or code which is
depend on it.

Thanks

> 
> 
> -- 
> Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>     GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
> 




[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23  0:01 [PATCH V2] i40iw: Do not set self-referencing pointer to NULL after kfree Shiraz Saleem
     [not found] ` <1471910507-83104-1-git-send-email-shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23  1:41   ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]     ` <20160823014135.GF15065-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 16:00       ` Shiraz Saleem
     [not found]         ` <20160823160030.GA37288-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 16:51           ` Doug Ledford
     [not found]             ` <a65ff978-0790-24aa-d0c9-0e5aaaf7b301-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 18:46               ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]                 ` <20160823184623.GN15065-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 19:00                   ` Shiraz Saleem
     [not found]                     ` <20160823190022.GA76544-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 19:05                       ` Doug Ledford
     [not found]                         ` <66032524-b459-6429-93f9-101da7809f7e-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-23 21:03                           ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
     [not found]                             ` <20160823210347.GP15065-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-24 16:51                               ` Shiraz Saleem
2016-08-24 15:27   ` Doug Ledford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160823210347.GP15065@leon.nu \
    --to=leon-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=e1000-rdma-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox