From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC rdma-next 2/3] IB/core: Export mlx5 vendor specific strucutres Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:17:18 -0600 Message-ID: <20160915161718.GD18154@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1473841649-8923-1-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <1473841649-8923-3-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <20160915061336.GA4869@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160915061336.GA4869-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Leon Romanovsky , dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:36PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > index 4edb0f2..e804cc3 100644 > > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/Kbuild > > @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ header-y += rdma_netlink.h > > header-y += rdma_user_cm.h > > header-y += hfi/ > > header-y += rdma_user_rxe.h > > +header-y += providers/ > > Can we avoid the horrible providers name? The directories for drivers > in the source tree so far are called hw/ and sw/ so we should stick to > that here as well. I also don't like the provider name, it is not consistent with Linux. Not sure hw/sw is any better, other subsystems don't split their drivers like that. Just driver/? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html