From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: building rdma-core from travis Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:07:16 -0600 Message-ID: <20161018160716.GB24189@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB096A7B@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB096A91@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20161018050834.GF25013@leon.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161018050834.GF25013-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: "Hefty, Sean" , "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:08:34AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > I can see that travis runs successfully against rdma-core. Was there a > > > magic setting used to work-around the travis version? > > > > It looks like rdma-core requires the 'trusty' build on travis... > > Yes, you are right. > "# We need at least cmake 2.12, this means we need to use trusty." > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=147587977913428&w=2 Right. rdma-core does not support precise, at all. Aside from cmake, the original source packages had some non-functional 'compat' for such an old glibc (from 2012!) that I stripped out as well. I can't recommend that anybody working on a c-language project should be using the precise images on travis for anything Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html