Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/4] IB/mlx4: Fix out-of-range array index in destroy qp flow

[Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:35:42AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/30/16 21:31, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:29:55AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 11/28/2016 12:31 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> I'm extra cautions with stable tags and prefer to finalize my stable
> >>> checker in my submissions scripts first, before adding it manually and
> >>> I have plans to use it next kernel release.
> >>
> >> Thanks for explaining your workflow. However, the question remains whether
> >> or not stable tags should be added to the patches in this series?
> >
> > It can be added but I don't see any real advantage of it. Do you know
> > about real users who run RDMA stack from stable trees and don't rely on
> > distro kernel and/or OFED?
>
> Hello Leon,
>
> Many users who build an iSER or SRP storage target themselves use a
> recent stable kernel without OFED.

Hello Bart,

I'll take into account these users in my future submissions. Meanwhile this
series can be easily picked by various automatic scripts which stable
maintainers are running.

Thanks.

>
> Bart.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]