Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB/rxe: Three small fixes

[Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1674 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:19:50PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 12/22/2016 2:05 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:33:43PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >> On 12/22/2016 12:18 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:41:24AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >>>> On 12/22/2016 8:54 AM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> >>>>> This patch series addresses two issues found during heavy traffic
> >>>>> testing as well as a recently-reported Smatch issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andrew Boyer (3):
> >>>>>   IB/rxe: Use BTH_PSN_MASK when ACKing duplicate sends
> >>>>>   IB/rxe: Drop future atomic/read packets rather than retrying
> >>>>>   IB/rxe: Don't check for null ptr in send()
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_comp.c | 2 +-
> >>>>>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c  | 3 +--
> >>>>>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 3 ++-
> >>>>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, series applied.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Doug,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for such fast response, but can you please give enough time to
> >>> other reviewers/relevant maintainers to take a look on them before
> >>> applying?
> >>
> >> If the patches look like they need review, I wait for review.  These did
> >> not meet that criteria IMO.
> >
> > Two of three are trivial, and another one is worth to take an extra time
> > to review.
>
> Which one did you think was not trivial?

Personaly for me, it was second patch from the series.

>
>
> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>     GPG Key ID: B826A3330E572FDD
>     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
>




[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]