From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/22] convert NFS server to new rdma_rw API Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 06:34:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20170108143402.GA2243@infradead.org> References: <20170107170258.14126.8503.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170107170258.14126.8503.stgit-Hs+gFlyCn65vLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Chuck Lever Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 12:15:15PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > This series converts the Linux NFS server RPC-over-RDMA > implementation to use the new core rdma_rw API and to poll its CQs > in workqueue mode. > > Previously published work prototyped only the path that sends RPC > replies. This series converts both send and receive sides, and > includes significant clean ups that result from using the new API. > > This series has been successfully tested with NFSv3, 4.0, and 4.1; > with clients that use FRWR and FMR; and with sec=sys, krb5, krb5i, > and krb5p. Any performane improvements (or regressions) with it? > 10 files changed, 1621 insertions(+), 1656 deletions(-) Hmm, that's not much less code, especially compared to the other target side drivers where we remove a very substantial amount of code. I guess I need to spend some time with the individual patches to understand why. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html